2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2019.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer, school, and country variations in adolescents’ health behaviour: A multilevel analysis of binary response variables in six European cities

Abstract: Adolescents often display similar health behaviour to their peers. Peer effects on health behaviour may be influenced by the school context, and by the country of residence. According to the complex contagion theory, these effects for risky health behaviour may be different from protective health behaviour. This paper combines social network analysis and multilevel analysis to estimate the relative share of variation of risky and protective health behaviours at different levels of the population structure: ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Relationships between objective peer effects and PIU reveal significant patterns. Our results differ from previous studies focused on adolescents, which consistently show a positive relationship between objective peer effects and deviant behaviors (Haynie, 2002;Lorant & Tranmer, 2019;Rulison et al, 2014). In our study, the objective peer effects-indegree, betweenness, and percentage of PIU peers-were not direct risk factors for the adoption of problematic behaviors among college students, a more mature group than adolescents.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Relationships between objective peer effects and PIU reveal significant patterns. Our results differ from previous studies focused on adolescents, which consistently show a positive relationship between objective peer effects and deviant behaviors (Haynie, 2002;Lorant & Tranmer, 2019;Rulison et al, 2014). In our study, the objective peer effects-indegree, betweenness, and percentage of PIU peers-were not direct risk factors for the adoption of problematic behaviors among college students, a more mature group than adolescents.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Social capital theory (Kawachi & Berkman, 2014), complex contagion theory (Centola & Macy, 2007), and social bond theory (Hirschi, 1969) suggest that prosocial and antisocial behaviors could be diffused through a peer network. Empirical evidence demonstrated that misconduct is more contagious during adolescence than childhood and emerging adulthood (Daw, Margolis, & Verdery, 2015;Lorant & Tranmer, 2019), whereas prosocial conduct or nondeviant behaviors are less contagious (Rulison, Kreager, & Wayne Osgood, 2014). Moffitt (1993) described this as the gap between one's biological and social maturity.…”
Section: Objective Peer Effects On Piumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings on depressive affect, feeling unhappy and hopeless, the intimacy dimension and the positive, enhancing effect of caring dimensions explaining social exclusion by friends support other findings and related literature (Schwartz-Mette, Smith, 2018;Lorant, Tranmer, 2019). Mobbing in the business world is seen as peer bullying in peer relationships and bullying in love affairs or personal relationships (Siyez, M., Aysan, 2007;Vanderbilt, Augustyn, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Among adolescents, the social environment influences health behaviors mainly related to alcohol and smoking. Networks of peers were found to have similar risky health behaviors when it comes to smoking, drinking, and cannabis use ( 33 ). Regarding smoking behavior, our data showed a significant and positive trend to improvement among boys and girls with 13–14 years and 15–16 years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%