2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.950968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and the Market for Digital Information Goods

Abstract: We study competitive interaction between two alternative models of digital content distribution over the Internet: peer-to-peer (p2p) …le sharing and centralized client-server distribution.We present microfoundations for a stylized model of p2p …le sharing where all peers are endowed with standard preferences and show that the endogenous structure of the network is conducive to sharing by a signi…cant number of peers, even if sharing is costlier than freeriding. We build on this model of p2p to analyze the opt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, if A&M consider that sales displacement could be smaller than one, they are assuming that file‐sharing sites and the music industry compete with heterogeneous goods. This is consistent with Casadesus‐Masanell and Hervas‐Drane (), who posit that commercial legal online content providers can optimize and deliver new experiences to consumers (i.e., speed, quality, fashion) which cannot be matched by decentralized, self‐sustained P2P networks. Therefore, there is agreement in the literature with A&M that there is a degree of sales displacement and that file‐sharing sites and commercial music firms are providers of non‐homogeneous goods and hence have different prices.…”
Section: Theoretical Weaknessessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, if A&M consider that sales displacement could be smaller than one, they are assuming that file‐sharing sites and the music industry compete with heterogeneous goods. This is consistent with Casadesus‐Masanell and Hervas‐Drane (), who posit that commercial legal online content providers can optimize and deliver new experiences to consumers (i.e., speed, quality, fashion) which cannot be matched by decentralized, self‐sustained P2P networks. Therefore, there is agreement in the literature with A&M that there is a degree of sales displacement and that file‐sharing sites and commercial music firms are providers of non‐homogeneous goods and hence have different prices.…”
Section: Theoretical Weaknessessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our work also contributes to the growing literature examining competitive dynamics between firms with different business models. Studies have examined such dynamics in a number of industries, including the software industry (e.g., Casadesus‐Masanell and Ghemawat, ; Economides and Katsamakas, ; Casadesus‐Masanell and Yoffie, ; Lee and Mendelson, ), the cable industry (Seamans, ), and the music industry (Casadesus‐Masanell and Hervas‐Drane, ). Much of this literature has focused on interactions between firms with exogenously given business models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…File swarming has become an increasingly common practice – a technology to expedite content delivery, small segments of a requested file are downloaded from multiple provision nodes simultaneously. This indicates that the expected download time depends on the satisfied request rate (i.e., the download rate) and the aggregate service capacity from sharing peer nodes (Casadesus‐Masanell and Hervas‐Drane , Qiu and Srikant , Yang and de Veciana ). Given sharing decision s i and upload capacity μ i for node i , the total capacity is Γ=k=1nμksk. The expected download time of a request from node i is estimated as follows:Did=HinormalΓ1=Hi)(k=1nitalicμksk1.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, KaZaA rewards sharing users with bonuses such as free hotel stays or similar gifts from allied firms such as advertisers. Research studies have shown that payment‐based mechanisms – which often take the form of pricing schemes to rebate users’ sharing behavior charging users’ requesting behavior – can effectively mitigate the free‐riding issue and restore network efficiency (Casadesus‐Masanell and Hervas‐Drane , Kang and Wu , Park and van der Schaar ,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%