2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10257-017-0357-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption platforms: a taxonomy and a reproducible analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, sharing economy has rapidly grown as an economic, social, and technological phenomenon (Trenz, Frey, & Veit, 2018), which has dramatically changed the traditional concept of attachment and ownership that has been replaced by the idea of access, sharing, and collective usage (Bardhi & Eckhardt, 2012; Dellaert, 2019; H. Lee, Yang, & Koo, 2019; Milanova & Maas, 2017). In this context, consumers tend to distance themselves from ownership, as they may find functionality advantageous compared to the possession of goods and the exchange consumption experience more important to the permanent acquisition of tangible items (Chasin, von Hoffen, Cramer, & Matzner, 2018). Eckhardt et al (2019, p. 7) explicitly defined sharing economy as “a scalable socioeconomic system that employs technology‐enabled platforms to provide users with temporary access to tangible and intangible resources that may be crowdsourced,” while they identified the characteristics of the sharing economy as temporary access, transfer of economic value, platform mediation, expanded consumer role, crowdsources supply, reputation systems, and peer‐to‐peer exchanges.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, sharing economy has rapidly grown as an economic, social, and technological phenomenon (Trenz, Frey, & Veit, 2018), which has dramatically changed the traditional concept of attachment and ownership that has been replaced by the idea of access, sharing, and collective usage (Bardhi & Eckhardt, 2012; Dellaert, 2019; H. Lee, Yang, & Koo, 2019; Milanova & Maas, 2017). In this context, consumers tend to distance themselves from ownership, as they may find functionality advantageous compared to the possession of goods and the exchange consumption experience more important to the permanent acquisition of tangible items (Chasin, von Hoffen, Cramer, & Matzner, 2018). Eckhardt et al (2019, p. 7) explicitly defined sharing economy as “a scalable socioeconomic system that employs technology‐enabled platforms to provide users with temporary access to tangible and intangible resources that may be crowdsourced,” while they identified the characteristics of the sharing economy as temporary access, transfer of economic value, platform mediation, expanded consumer role, crowdsources supply, reputation systems, and peer‐to‐peer exchanges.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В работе (Chasin, von Hoffen and Cramer, 2017) представлены результаты комплексного исследования развития более 500 цифровых платформ P2P и SCC, выявлены закономерности и описана их эволюция. Авторы выделяют различные подходы к анализу цифровых платформ, в зависимости от используемых ресурсов, направления деятельности и других факторов.…”
Section: понятие долевой экономикиunclassified
“…Engagement platforms facilitate the exchange of resources that help build and strengthen bonds between new communities (Breidbach & Brodie, 2017). The sharing economy has particularly disrupted the hospitality sector with Airbnb, and the automobile sharing sector through Uber (Altinay & Taheri, 2019; Chasin, von Hoffen, Cramer, & Matzner, 2018; Ert & Fleischer, 2019). Their platforms attract unconventional participants to the market because the new opportunities are providing income whilst also permitting immediacy and personal interactions with customers (Osman, D'Acunto, & Johns, 2019; Simon & Roederer, 2019; Tussyadiah, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%