2015
DOI: 10.1111/area.12166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peering through loopholes, tracing conversions: remapping the transborder trade in electronic waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some materials could be collected freely while others were still controlled under the planned economy. Migrant workers, as described in the fragment above, started to scavenge waste materials in the 1980s (Kirby & Lora-Wainwright, 2015), and were responsible for a new appreciation that transformed the social ontology of waste into the valuable resource from which they are now separated. This account underlines the importance of both narrative and legislation in socially constructing traditional recycling as outside the dominant development regime (Schulz, 2015).…”
Section: The Enclosure Of the "Waste Commons"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some materials could be collected freely while others were still controlled under the planned economy. Migrant workers, as described in the fragment above, started to scavenge waste materials in the 1980s (Kirby & Lora-Wainwright, 2015), and were responsible for a new appreciation that transformed the social ontology of waste into the valuable resource from which they are now separated. This account underlines the importance of both narrative and legislation in socially constructing traditional recycling as outside the dominant development regime (Schulz, 2015).…”
Section: The Enclosure Of the "Waste Commons"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will enable the informal sector to collect, separate and perform low-level recycling while allowing the formal sector to perform high-level recycling, thus promoting efficiency and harmony in the supply chain [57]. Other scholars lament using terms such as scavenging and informal as pessimistic, biased, and wrongly portraying the e-waste phenomenon [58].…”
Section: Bottlenecks To Managing E-wastementioning
confidence: 99%