2020
DOI: 10.3390/genes11091029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PEG-Delivered CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins System for Gene-Editing Screening of Maize Protoplasts

Abstract: Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 technology allows the modification of DNA sequences in vivo at the location of interest. Although CRISPR-Cas9 can produce genomic changes that do not require DNA vector carriers, the use of transgenesis for the stable integration of DNA coding for gene-editing tools into plant genomes is still the most used approach. However, it can generate unintended transgenic integrations, while Cas9 prolonged-expression can increase cleavage at off-ta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation is that the presence of a more open chromatin structure for the MIR604TS2 target locus in leaf vs. immature embryos. It should be noted that protoplast transfection has been widely applied to assess Cas9 RNP activity against different targets in various plant species including maize (Woo et al, 2015;Malnoy et al, 2016;Svitashev et al, 2016;Andersson et al, 2018;Liang et al, 2018;Lin et al, 2018;Murovec et al, 2018;Sant'Ana et al, 2020). Since a much higher percentage of cells can receive RNP in comparison with direct embryo bombardment, protoplast transfection is expected to result (on average) in much higher editing efficiencies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is that the presence of a more open chromatin structure for the MIR604TS2 target locus in leaf vs. immature embryos. It should be noted that protoplast transfection has been widely applied to assess Cas9 RNP activity against different targets in various plant species including maize (Woo et al, 2015;Malnoy et al, 2016;Svitashev et al, 2016;Andersson et al, 2018;Liang et al, 2018;Lin et al, 2018;Murovec et al, 2018;Sant'Ana et al, 2020). Since a much higher percentage of cells can receive RNP in comparison with direct embryo bombardment, protoplast transfection is expected to result (on average) in much higher editing efficiencies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficiencies of different Cas systems and gRNAs can be quickly evaluated using this method. PEG-mediated protoplast assays have been developed for many plant species, including Arabidopsis thaliana , rice ( Oryza sativa ), lettuce ( Lactuca sativa ) ( Woo et al., 2015 ), tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum and N. attenuata ) ( Woo et al., 2015 ; Kim et al., 2017 ), petunia ( Petunia × hybrida ) ( Subburaj et al., 2016 ; Yu et al., 2020 ), maize ( Zea mays ) ( Sant’Ana et al., 2020 ), grapevine ( Vitis vinifera ), apple ( Malus × domestica ) ( Malnoy et al., 2016 ), wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) ( Liang et al., 2017 ), soybean ( Glycine max ) ( Kim et al., 2017 ; Kim and Choi, 2020 ), potato ( Solanum tuberosum ) ( Andersson et al., 2018 ; González et al., 2020 ), cabbage ( Brassica oleracea ), Chinese cabbage ( Brassica rapa ) ( Murovec et al., 2018 ), and banana ( Musa spp.) ( Wu et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Rnp Delivery Into Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chardonnay) Mildew locus O 7 (MLO-7) Cas9 protoplast PEG targeted deep sequencing 0.1% Malnoy et al. (2016) Maize ( Zea mays ) Inositol phosphate kinase (IPK) Cas9 protoplast PEG Sanger sequencing 0.85%–5.85% Sant’Ana et al. (2020) Hot pepper ( Capsicum annuum cv.…”
Section: Rnp Applications In Plant Genome Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soon after the first successful reports [9], the DNA-free editing approach was applied on a number of species. Since the review of Metje-Sprink et al [8], researchers have achieved DNA-free editing in Nicotiana benthaminiana [10], potato [11], wheat and maize [12,13], Brassicaceae [14], rice [15], banana [16], lettuce [17], pepper [18]. While two years is not a significantly long period, it is clear that commercially important species have become the main target for DNA-free genomic manipulations (i.e.…”
Section: Targeted Plant Species and Delivery Techniques Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ribonucleoprotein complexes and nanoparticles are delivered in plant cells mostly by particle bombardment [23] or protoplast transformation. In the latter case lipofection [14,24] or PEG-Ca 2þ transfection [13,15,16] is used. Electroporation is another way to deliver macromolecules across protoplast membrane and well-designed protocols are available [7], but there have been no reports (to our knowledge) during the last two years.…”
Section: Crispr/cas Delivered As Ribonucleoprotein Complexes/nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%