Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2414536.2414551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peg hunting

Abstract: Many tools, techniques and devices have been developed to support people traversing their environment. In this paper we report findings from a series of realistic outdoor experiments conducted to understand the comparative, task-specific strengths and limitations of a GPS-enabled navigation map and egocentric navigation systems. These tasks included both macro-and micro-navigation aspects. Our findings suggest that while GPS-enabled navigation maps are preferred for moving over larger distances (macro-navigati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A principle concern has been that technologies are often developed without designing for how users then appropriate technologies to existing practices in those settings (Crabtree et al, 2013). For example, turn-by-turn navigational instructions developed for driving and walking in urban environments do not translate well into unstructured rural environments (McGookin & Magnusson, 2012); GPS-navigation is useful for macro-navigation, but poor at supporting micro-navigation (D'Orazio & Lueg, 2012).…”
Section: Technologies Walking and Navigatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A principle concern has been that technologies are often developed without designing for how users then appropriate technologies to existing practices in those settings (Crabtree et al, 2013). For example, turn-by-turn navigational instructions developed for driving and walking in urban environments do not translate well into unstructured rural environments (McGookin & Magnusson, 2012); GPS-navigation is useful for macro-navigation, but poor at supporting micro-navigation (D'Orazio & Lueg, 2012).…”
Section: Technologies Walking and Navigatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Users of map apps perform acts of orientation in a similar way to those using traditional maps, but they also make use of dynamic features, such as "walking the blue dot" to check a new position relative to a previous one (Brown et al, 2013). Map apps also present users with sense-making problems which manifest as navigational troubles, such as time lag for GPS (D'Orazio & Lueg, 2012). The uses of guides and maps are shaped by the activities they serve, equally the guide or map is shaped towards its uses (e.g., the difference between a game map and a guided tour map [Bell et al, 2009]).…”
Section: Technologies Walking and Navigatingmentioning
confidence: 99%