2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03579.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pegfilgrastim‐ versus filgrastim‐based autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in the setting of preemptive use of plerixafor: efficacy and cost analysis

Abstract: Single administration of 12 mg of PEG is associated with better CD34+ mobilization than FIL allowing for effective, convenient mobilization with less frequent use of plerixafor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent data also suggest that when pegfilgrastim 12 mg stat dose, rather than filgrastim 10 mcg/kg/ day is used for steady-state mobilization in a risk-adapted plerixafor protocol, pegfilgrastim-mobilized patients were less likely to require the addition of plerixafor to meet mobilization targets. 27 Our data would suggest that the cost of mobilization in this protocol could be further reduced by the use of 6 mg pegfilgrastim.…”
Section: P-valuementioning
confidence: 76%
“…Recent data also suggest that when pegfilgrastim 12 mg stat dose, rather than filgrastim 10 mcg/kg/ day is used for steady-state mobilization in a risk-adapted plerixafor protocol, pegfilgrastim-mobilized patients were less likely to require the addition of plerixafor to meet mobilization targets. 27 Our data would suggest that the cost of mobilization in this protocol could be further reduced by the use of 6 mg pegfilgrastim.…”
Section: P-valuementioning
confidence: 76%
“…The development and validation of this algorithm has been described elsewhere, 22,24 as well as the performance of this algorithm in the setting of pegfilgrastim-based mobilization. 23 Steady state filgrastim-based and pegfilgrastim-based mobilization were performed in two consecutive cohorts and the choice of growth factor was not influenced by any patient or disease characteristic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 In this study, we examine 89 patients with MM (49 previously exposed to lenalidomide) who proceeded to steady state growth factor-based AHSC mobilization with preemptive ('just in time') use of plerixafor depending on peripheral blood CD34 þ enumeration on the 4th day of mobilization and following a previously validated and published algorithm. 14,22,23 The goals of the study are to determine if growth factor plus preemptive plerixafor overcomes the negative effect of lenalidomide on AHSC mobilization, and to estimate the impact of prior lenalidomide on plerixafor use, mobilization cost and resource utilization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma G-CSF levels were about 1 log higher with pegfilgrastim, but in the setting of autologous ASCT, this did not result into a faster hematopoietic recovery. Only few data are available on the biological effects of pegfilgrastim, which suggest that pegfilgrastim stimulation results in different functional properties of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells compared with conventional G-CSF [74,75].…”
Section: Growth Factors In Combination With Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%