2022
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/ac6e73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pellet source density in toroidal plasma configurations based on a 2D Gaussian deposition model

Abstract: We develop a two-dimensional (2D) Gaussian deposition model to calculate the initial pellet deposition density immediately after pellet ablation, which is valid before the ∇B-drift of the ablated material significantly shifts its location. A 2D Gaussian particle distribution is assumed in the ablation cloud cross-section. Applying this new model to a typical EAST plasma, and comparing it with the conventional point deposition model, it is found that the new model can resolve the tangential singularity problem … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the scaling law for the average ∇B induced drift displacement is used in PAM code, instead of self-consistently calculating it for each plasmoid as done in HPI2 code. It should be mentioned that the agreement between the two codes is better in HFS injection cases than in LFS injection cases such as the one shown here, as shown in [22], because usually there is no loss of pellet particles due to ∇B induced drift in HFS injection cases. Particle loss due to ∇B induced drift in LFS injection cases can significantly change the shape and the peak position of the deposition profile.…”
Section: Simulation Setup and An Example Benchmark With Hpi2mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Second, the scaling law for the average ∇B induced drift displacement is used in PAM code, instead of self-consistently calculating it for each plasmoid as done in HPI2 code. It should be mentioned that the agreement between the two codes is better in HFS injection cases than in LFS injection cases such as the one shown here, as shown in [22], because usually there is no loss of pellet particles due to ∇B induced drift in HFS injection cases. Particle loss due to ∇B induced drift in LFS injection cases can significantly change the shape and the peak position of the deposition profile.…”
Section: Simulation Setup and An Example Benchmark With Hpi2mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Pellet particle deposition models implemented in PAM include the point deposition model, the uniform areal deposition model [21], the 1D Gaussian deposition model, and the 2D Gaussian deposition model [22]. In this paper, we employ the newly developed 2D Gaussian deposition model to evaluate the pellet deposition density.…”
Section: Pellet Particle Deposition Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental measurements of local density increase after PI plays a crucial role in enhancing and refining the HPI2 pellet simulation code on EAST [30,31]. A comparison between experimental measurements and simulation results is presented in figure 12.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these two codes adopt scaling laws for reducing the computational costs, and correspondingly, the codes do not run in a selfconsistent way with the pellet ablation and deposition, and neglects many sophisticated physical processes. [23,24] In this work, the HPI2 code is utilized to simulate the pellet ablation and deposition based on first principles. The pellet ablation simulation in HPI2 is based on the neutral gas and plasma shielding (NGPS) model, [19,25,26] which is further developed on the basis of the NGS model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%