2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07016-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pellet Supply Costs Along Three Case Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other work that could be used to compare the benefits of building a pellet mill among different countries are limited in scope. Nunes et al (2014a) focus on Portugal, Germany, and Sweden, whereas Ehrig et al (2014) look at Canada, Australia, and Russia. The objective of each is to provide market analyses and cost comparisons; however, they do not consider country risk beyond the cost of capital (a single rate is applied uniformly to each country in both papers).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other work that could be used to compare the benefits of building a pellet mill among different countries are limited in scope. Nunes et al (2014a) focus on Portugal, Germany, and Sweden, whereas Ehrig et al (2014) look at Canada, Australia, and Russia. The objective of each is to provide market analyses and cost comparisons; however, they do not consider country risk beyond the cost of capital (a single rate is applied uniformly to each country in both papers).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nunes et al (2014a) evaluate the production potential of Portugal, Germany and Sweden and find only Portugal to be economically competitive in the global market due to lower resource and labor costs. Ehrig et al (2014) estimate the cost of producing in and shipping wood pellets from Canada, Australia, and Russia. Their results suggest that Australia is not competitive due to high supply costs and Canada is risky due to extremely low profit margins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%