2023
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3455761/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pelvic exenteration surgery outcomes following establishment of a Complex Pelvic Surgery multidisciplinary tertiary unit

Alicia Mackowski,
Alexandra Limmer,
Tahmina Jahan Lata
et al.

Abstract: Background: Pelvic exenteration surgery (PES) is a complex operation associated with significant morbidity. PES requires sub-specialised multidisciplinary input along with expertise in complex pelvic surgery and anatomy. The majority of published data on PES comes from high volume units, however there is emerging evidence of acceptable short and long-term outcomes in lower volume units where dedicated multidisciplinary teams are established. This study reports outcomes of PES in a lower volume centre with a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Worldwide R0 resection rates for PES are reported to be 79.9% [12]. The higher R0 resection rates within this study (92.2%) may be due to a higher proportion of primary to recurrent cancers, and the unit's emphasis on careful pre-operative surgical planning and interdisciplinary communication during processing and assessment of pathology specimens within the Complex Pelvic Surgery MDT setting [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Worldwide R0 resection rates for PES are reported to be 79.9% [12]. The higher R0 resection rates within this study (92.2%) may be due to a higher proportion of primary to recurrent cancers, and the unit's emphasis on careful pre-operative surgical planning and interdisciplinary communication during processing and assessment of pathology specimens within the Complex Pelvic Surgery MDT setting [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%