2000
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2000.tb123967.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pelvic fractures diagnosed by bone scintigraphy in patients with normal radiographs after a fall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bone scintigraphy has previously been described for the investigation of patients in whom the suspicion of a fracture is present, despite normal radiography (Fig 2 & 3). [3][4][5] This imaging modality may highlight an area of fracture before a radiograph. It has been shown to be a sensitive (93%) and specific (95%) indicator of occult fractures of the proximal femur, provided careful interpretation is made to avoid the diagnostic pitfalls (including false negative scans if performed too early or fractures through avascular bone; false positives with acetabular curtain osteophytes and calcific capsulitis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone scintigraphy has previously been described for the investigation of patients in whom the suspicion of a fracture is present, despite normal radiography (Fig 2 & 3). [3][4][5] This imaging modality may highlight an area of fracture before a radiograph. It has been shown to be a sensitive (93%) and specific (95%) indicator of occult fractures of the proximal femur, provided careful interpretation is made to avoid the diagnostic pitfalls (including false negative scans if performed too early or fractures through avascular bone; false positives with acetabular curtain osteophytes and calcific capsulitis).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%