Pelvic organ prolapse after subtotal and total hysterectomy: a long‐term follow‐up of an open randomised controlled multicentre study

Ismail, Sharif I. M. F.

doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12700

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1,2 The interpretation of the number of randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing abdominal subtotal hysterectomy (SH) and total hysterectomy (TH) should be seen not only in terms of the absolute number of RCTs but also in light of the time period during which the methods have been used. Both SH and TH have been used for more than a century but the first RCT presenting data on surgical outcomes was published in 2002.…”

Section: Sirmentioning

confidence: 99%

Authors' reply: Pelvic organ prolapse after subtotal and total hysterectomy: a long‐term follow‐up of an open randomised controlled multicentre study

Kjølhede

Persson

Brynhildsen

2014

BJOG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Sirmentioning

confidence: 99%

Authors' reply: Pelvic organ prolapse after subtotal and total hysterectomy: a long‐term follow‐up of an open randomised controlled multicentre study

Kjølhede

Persson

Brynhildsen

2014

BJOG

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Epidemiologic studies show that pelvic prolapse has a relatively high morbidity rate of approximate 11%. The risks of surgical treatment leading to urinary incontinence are up to 11–20%, with a high recurrence probability [ 1 , 2 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Perineal Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Detection for Evaluation of Pelvic Diaphragm in Resting State

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the consistency differences between ultrasound and MRI detection methods and the reliability between 2 independent observers.Material/MethodsUnder 2 kinds of states – the resting state and muscle contractions state – intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated and the consistency of 2 diagnostic methods was evaluated by 2 independent observers. We also assessed the interscorer reliability of the 2 observers.ResultsIn terms of the evaluation of biological parameters of the pelvic diaphragm, the consistency of the 2 diagnostic methods was moderate. The ICC of pelvic diaphragm area was 0.55 (95% CI 0.35–0.71), anteroposterior diameter was 0.48 (95% CI 0.28–0.64), and transverse diameter was 0.43 (95% CI 0.25–0.63). The ultrasound detection values of the perineal ultrasound were significantly smaller than those of the MRI. In addition, these differences were increased with the rise of the pelvic diaphragm area.ConclusionsBy evaluating the pelvic diaphragm in patients with pelvic organ prolapse in the resting state, it was preliminarily confirmed that the consistency of ultrasound and MRI was only moderate. The comparison of these 2 diagnostic methods under the dynamic muscle contraction state needs to be further explored.

show abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse after subtotal and total hysterectomy: a long‐term follow‐up of an open randomised controlled multicentre study

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

Authors' reply: Pelvic organ prolapse after subtotal and total hysterectomy: a long‐term follow‐up of an open randomised controlled multicentre study

Authors' reply: Pelvic organ prolapse after subtotal and total hysterectomy: a long‐term follow‐up of an open randomised controlled multicentre study

Perineal Ultrasound Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Detection for Evaluation of Pelvic Diaphragm in Resting State

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About