2019
DOI: 10.18187/pjsor.v15i4.2943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penalized Splines Fitting for a Poisson Response Including Outliers

Abstract: There have been various studies in the literature on investigating the relationship between a count response and several covariates. Most researchers study count variables and use traditional methods (i.e. generalized linear models-GLM). However, GLM is limited when dealing with outliers and nonlinear relationships. Generalized Additive Models (GAM) is an extension of GLM, where the assumptions on the link functions and components are additive and smooth, respectively. Our aim is to propose a flexible extensio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore used spatial buffers of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 km. We modelled counts of spillovers within each buffer through a set of GAMs that used Poisson distributions and penalised splines for AUC, again using REML and γ = 1.4 to limit overfitting (Kilinc & Asfha, 2019). To more specifically estimate the shape of the association between AUC and spillover, we also applied nonlinear least squares to fit linear, saturating, and quadratic relationships using the nls package for each spatial scale and compared models with AICc (Seber & Wild, 2005).…”
Section: Hev Spillover Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore used spatial buffers of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 km. We modelled counts of spillovers within each buffer through a set of GAMs that used Poisson distributions and penalised splines for AUC, again using REML and γ = 1.4 to limit overfitting (Kilinc & Asfha, 2019). To more specifically estimate the shape of the association between AUC and spillover, we also applied nonlinear least squares to fit linear, saturating, and quadratic relationships using the nls package for each spatial scale and compared models with AICc (Seber & Wild, 2005).…”
Section: Hev Spillover Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore used spatial buffers of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 km. We modeled counts of spillovers within each buffer through a set of GAMs that used Poisson distributions and penalized splines for pathogen pressure [62]. As in our GAM analyses of AUC, we also included a bivariate smooth of longitude and latitude.…”
Section: Hev Spillover Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%