2001
DOI: 10.1006/jdeq.2001.4027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penalty Approximation for Non-smooth Constraints in Vibroimpact

Abstract: We examine the penalty approximation of the free motion of a material point in an angular domain; we choose an over-damped penalty approximation, and we prove that if the first impact point is not at the vertex, then the limit of the approximation exists and is described by Moreau's rule for inelastic impacts. The proofs rely on validated asymptotics and use some classical tools of the theory of dynamical systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of a single impact, the result obtained for unilaterally constrained mechanical systems in [62], [63], [72] by penalization methods coincides with that presented previously. The latter, however, is not restricted to some special equation structure, as in the case of purely and partially elastic obstacles in impact mechanics, and is valid for general unilaterally constrained dynamic systems, encompassing mechanical systems as a particular case.…”
Section: Remarksupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of a single impact, the result obtained for unilaterally constrained mechanical systems in [62], [63], [72] by penalization methods coincides with that presented previously. The latter, however, is not restricted to some special equation structure, as in the case of purely and partially elastic obstacles in impact mechanics, and is valid for general unilaterally constrained dynamic systems, encompassing mechanical systems as a particular case.…”
Section: Remarksupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Furthermore, the implications of applying the results obtained on the basis of such limit description to the actual system should be clarified, as well. The techniques currently available for modeling the limit behavior of systems with singular motions include quasi-differential equations [61] and differential inclusions [67], [55], [57], and complementarity [20] and penalty methods [63], [72], [66], with modeling reported in [64], [65]. The first two representations give system evolution not in terms of an isolated trajectory, but a set of trajectories, referred to as integral funnel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Moreau [7,8] (see also [15,17] for a mathematical justification of this impact law by a penalty method) we assume inelastic impacts i.e.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introducing the shift operator along the paths of (26) as in (21) and following the subsequent steps of the previous section, Eq. (26) yields the limit system corresponding to the original system (24) as µ → ∞.…”
Section: Multi-impact Controlled Discrete Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach indeed looks natural coming from Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics for the systems with unilateral constraints and appears in the so-called measure-type reaction forces localized at the constraint boundary. Moreover, this approach is augmented by penalty approximation of dynamic equations [20][21][22] for simulation purposes. However, in Zeno-type problems the complementarity approach has very limited applicability, since the solutions of the complementary models in these cases are characterized by nonuniqueness beyond accumulation points without additional requirements of the analyticity of the input signals [2].…”
Section: Infinite Transition Sequences Characterized By Accumulation mentioning
confidence: 99%