2016
DOI: 10.2422/2036-2145.201306_003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pencil type line arrangements of low degree: classification and monodromy

Abstract: The complete classification of (3, 3)-nets and of (3, 4)-nets with only double and triple points is given. Up to lattice isomorphism, there are exactly 3 effective possibilities in each case, and some of these provide new examples of pencil-type line arrangements. For arrangements consisting of  14 lines and having points of multiplicity  5, we show that the non-triviality of the monodromy on the first cohomology H 1 (F) of the associated Milnor fiber F implies the arrangement is of reduced pencil-type. In p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite its apparent simplicity, this case already poses quite a challenge. It was previously attacked in a number of papers, including [14,18,37], but only partial answers were obtained as a result. Our approach, though, provides a complete answer in this setting.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its apparent simplicity, this case already poses quite a challenge. It was previously attacked in a number of papers, including [14,18,37], but only partial answers were obtained as a result. Our approach, though, provides a complete answer in this setting.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it is unknown whether the first Betti number of an arrangement in 3-space is a function of the lattice alone. By [89], this is so for collections of up to 14 lines with up to 5-fold intersections in the projective plane. See also [134] for the origins of the approach.…”
Section: Milnor Fibersmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…First, we have with (iv) that 2z(1 + vx) = x(−2vx + 5v + 3). (7) If 1 + vx = 0, then x = 5v+3 2v with the previous equality. Since x = − 1 v we get v = −1, which contradicts our assumption.…”
Section: Assume Now (Umentioning
confidence: 99%