There is a clinical interest in increasing the extent of locomotor learning induced by split-belt treadmills that move each leg at different speeds. However, factors facilitating locomotor learning are poorly understood. We hypothesized that augmenting the braking forces, rather than propulsion forces, experienced at the feet would increase locomotor adaptation and learning. To test this, forces were modulated during split-belt walking with distinct slopes:inclined (larger propulsion than braking), declined (larger braking than propulsion), and flat (similar propulsion and braking). These groups were compared using step length asymmetry, which is a clinically relevant measure robustly adapted on split-belt treadmills. Unexpectedly, the group with larger propulsion demands (i.e., the incline group) adapted faster and more, and had larger after-effects when the split-belt perturbation was removed. We also found that subjects who propelled more during baseline and experienced larger disruptions of propulsion forces in early adaptation exhibited greater after-effects, which further highlights the catalytic role of propulsion on locomotor learning. The relevance of mechanical demands on shaping our movements was also indicated by the steady state split-belt behavior, during which each group recovered their baseline leg orientation to meet leg-specific force demands at the expense of step length symmetry. Notably, the flat group was nearly symmetric, whereas the incline and decline group overshot and undershot symmetry, respectively. Taken together, our results indicate that forces propelling the body facilitate gait adaptation during split-belt walking.Therefore, interventions that increase propulsion demands may be a viable strategy for augmenting locomotor learning in individuals with hemiparesis. 1999), reducing walking speed (Balasubramanian et al., 2007), compromising balance (Lewek et 47 al., 2014), and if not corrected, step length asymmetry leads to other comorbidities such as 48 musculoskeletal injuries (Jørgensen et al., 2000) and joint pain (Patterson et al., 2012). 49Promising studies have shown that walking with the legs moving at different speeds (i.e., split-50 belt walking) results in long-lasting reduction of step length asymmetry post-stroke when 51 walking overground (Reisman et al., 2009(Reisman et al., , 2013. However, split-belt walking is not always 52 effective even after repeated exposure to the split-belt experience (Reisman et al., 2013; Lewek 53 et al., 2017) and it is still unclear why some stroke survivors re-learn to walk symmetrically but 54 others do not. Thus, it is fundamental to identify factors facilitating split-belt adaptation to 55 augment them for increasing motor learning in all individuals. 56The increased mechanical work (Selgrade et al., 2017), step length asymmetry (Reisman 57 et al., 2005), and hence metabolic effort (Finley et al., 2013), upon introducing the split-belt 58 environment are thought to drive locomotor adaptation. Notably, these three factors are l...