2020
DOI: 10.24815/jpsi.v7i1.13554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penerapan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Peserta Didik

Abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan KPS peserta didik dengan penerapan LKPD berbasis inkuiri terbimbing. Desain penelitian yang digunakan berbentuk pretest posttest, control group design. Sampel pada penelitian ini adalah peserta didik kelas XI IPA 3 dan XI IPA 4 yang dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Data penelitian diperoleh dari lembar penilaian KPS peserta didik dan soal tes. Analisis data menggunakan uji gain dan uji t, diperoleh hasil uji t dengan nilai thitung≥ttabel yang berarti te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
7
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these results, it can be seen that the application of the guided inquiry learning model can improve the ability of students' science process skills. This is in accordance with the results of research showing that there are significant differences in the improvement of science process skills between classes that using guided inquiry worksheets with classes that do not use worksheets guided inquiry (Saidaturrahmi, et al, 2019). Another research, conducted was found that there was significant difference in science process skills between the experimental class and the control class on material solubility and solubility product (Fitriyani, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Based on these results, it can be seen that the application of the guided inquiry learning model can improve the ability of students' science process skills. This is in accordance with the results of research showing that there are significant differences in the improvement of science process skills between classes that using guided inquiry worksheets with classes that do not use worksheets guided inquiry (Saidaturrahmi, et al, 2019). Another research, conducted was found that there was significant difference in science process skills between the experimental class and the control class on material solubility and solubility product (Fitriyani, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The normality test aims to determine whether the data is normally distributed or not, while the homogeneity test is to determine whether the sample comes from the same population or not (Nurhadisah, Halim, & Khaldun, 2014;Saidaturrahmi, Gani, & Hasan, 2019). The provisions of the normality test and homogeneity test are if the signifi cance value is less than 0.05 then the data is not normally distributed and not homogeneous, whereas if the signifi cance value is more than 0.05 then the data is normally distributed and homogeneous (Rachmah, Sunaryanto, & Yuniastuti, 2019;Nurhadisah et al, 2014;Sulman, Adlim, & Ilyas, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is reinforced by research by Rialdi & Juniar (2020) which states that there is a correlation between student learning outcomes and students' science process skills taught by the guided inquiry learning model with the contribution of learning outcomes to science process skills by 65%. Saidaturrahmi et al (2019) said that the relationship between science process skills and learning outcomes is influenced by a guided inquiry learning model because students in the learning process work independently so that the science process skills that exist in students can develop the potential that exists in them. In Figure 3, it can be seen that the percentage of science process skills using the guided inquiry learning model is 90.7% with excellent criteria because 85 KPS are 100 percent, while the conventional model is 76.9 with good criteria because 70 KPS are 85 percent.…”
Section: Science Process Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%