2010
DOI: 10.4103/0976-3147.63095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetrating craniofacial arrow injury

Abstract: Arrow injuries are an extinct form of injury in most parts of the developed world, but are still seen, albeit infrequently in developing countries. Reports of penetrating injuries of the craniofacial region secondary to projectiles are few and far between. The morbidity-free outcome of surgical removal, in case of penetrating arrow injuries, despite the delay in presentation and, moreover, in the emergency surgical practice, are the salient points to be remembered whilst managing such cases, for ‘what the mind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Palavras-chave ► trauma craniocerebral ► lesão encefálica penetrante ► corpos estranhos ► hemorragia subaracnoideia póstraumática communal clashes, disputes between farmers and cattle herdsmen, and cattle theft. 4 Despite having a relative low-velocity (as fast as 58 m/sec) compared with firearm projectiles, the sharpness and propulsion force of the crossbow may be enough to enable penetrating injuries of the skull at short range. 5 In these cases, the conse-quences of the PBI depend on multiple factors, including the size of the penetrating object, the energy and speed of entry, the intracranial path, changes in intracranial pressure, and associated injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palavras-chave ► trauma craniocerebral ► lesão encefálica penetrante ► corpos estranhos ► hemorragia subaracnoideia póstraumática communal clashes, disputes between farmers and cattle herdsmen, and cattle theft. 4 Despite having a relative low-velocity (as fast as 58 m/sec) compared with firearm projectiles, the sharpness and propulsion force of the crossbow may be enough to enable penetrating injuries of the skull at short range. 5 In these cases, the conse-quences of the PBI depend on multiple factors, including the size of the penetrating object, the energy and speed of entry, the intracranial path, changes in intracranial pressure, and associated injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14] Apart from the injuries to facial skeleton, penetrating craniofacial injuries can lead to damage to orbit and its contents, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak and its sequel (risk of meningitis or abscess), intracranial hematomas, injury to neurovascular structures, and retained foreign bodies. 11,12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Indian J Neurotrauma:2020;17:143-145…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years the number of criminal incidents involving crossbows in the UK has become more apparent, with many incidents resulting in either injuries or fatalities [1][2][3][4][5]. Whilst the apparent increase of these incidents could potentially be attributed to media reporting bias, their reporting in academic literature has risen over the last few years [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Although the majority of incidents involving injury occur within open environments, there is evidence that individuals within vehicles are at risk [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%