Results45 patients were included in the study. 24 patients approached by thoracoscopy and thoracotomy 21. We found that 42 patients (93.3%) were male and three patients (6.7%) women with an age range between 13 and 55 years with a mean of 26,6 years.The mechanism of trauma in 43 patients (95.6%) were injured by sharp weapon and in two patients (4.4%) injured by gun fire to which Abstract Background: This study compares patient operated by thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in patients with penetrating chest wounds with massive hemothorax, hemodynamically stable.
Materials and methods:Retrospective study Cross sectional, type III level of evidence.45 patients were included in the study. In 24 of them were approached by thoracoscopy and the remaining 21 by thoracotomy and compared morbidity, hospital stay, operative time, complications and conversion rate in patients with penetrating trauma massive hemothorax managed by thoracotomy hemodynamically stable with those managed by thoracoscopy during the period from Results: Thoracoscopy is associated with reduced blood loss, less operative time, shorter hospital stay by filing a conversion rate of 12.5% video assisted surgery procedures and a lower rate of complications.
Conclusions:Thoracoscopy represents a therapeutic option and a safe approach in the right hands to the chest injured patients with massive hemothorax, hemodynamically stable.