2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetration behavior of reactive liner shaped charge jet impacting thick steel plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the finite-element model of integral with shell and liner circumferential MEFP warhead as shown in Figure 3, 8701 explosive [19,20] is selected, high explosive material model and JWL (Jones Wilkins Lee) state equation are used, material parameters are shown in Table 2, and JWL state equation expression is shown in Equation (1). General pressure expression of JWL equation of state [18]:…”
Section: Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the finite-element model of integral with shell and liner circumferential MEFP warhead as shown in Figure 3, 8701 explosive [19,20] is selected, high explosive material model and JWL (Jones Wilkins Lee) state equation are used, material parameters are shown in Table 2, and JWL state equation expression is shown in Equation (1). General pressure expression of JWL equation of state [18]:…”
Section: Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAT _NULL model is adopted for air materials. Air material parameters are shown in Table 4 [19]. The equation of state is described by linear polynomials, which is EOS_LINEAR_ POLYNOMIAL, and the element type is Euler grid.…”
Section: Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, for a given copper liner thickness, with increasing reactive liner thickness, the maximum P d of the reactive material-copper jet (RM-CJ) improves and the corresponding optimum standoff increases slightly. However, for the traditional single reactive liner shaped charge jet in the reference [24], the penetration depths of this reactive jet at the standoff of 1.0 CD, 1.5 CD, and 2.0 CD were 1.18 CD, 1.22 CD, and 0.95 CD, respectively. Thus, these experimental results indicate that, compared with the single reactive jet [24], the penetration depths of RM-CJ significantly increase.…”
Section: Experiments Of Penetrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFP with reactive materials, which can achieve enhanced behind-armor effects, was analyzed by experiments and numerical simulations [20]. Further studies on reactive liner shaped charges indicated that the reactive material mass entering the penetration hole and the initiation location of the reactive jet significantly influenced the overpressure inside the targets or the damage mechanism of concrete and steel targets [22,23,24]. In addition to PTFE/Al reactive materials, the jet formation and penetration behaviors of PTFE and PTFE/Cu reactive liner shaped charges have also been researched by experiments and simulations [4,25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo et al. investigated the shaped charge with reactive material liner (Al/PTFE powders) penetration into steel targets by experiments and theoretical analysis. Their results show that the shaped charge with reactive material liner can produce a larger hole diameter and a lower penetration depth than that with pure metal liner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%