2008
DOI: 10.1155/2008/543290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Penetration Loss Measurement and Modeling for HAP Mobile Systems in Urban Environment

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to present the results of a measurement campaign focused on the evaluation of penetration loss into buildings in an urban area as a function of the elevation angle. An empirical model to predict penetration loss into buildings is developed based on measured data obtained using a remote-controlled airship. The impact on penetration loss of different buildings and user positions within the buildings is presented. The measured data are evaluated as a function of the elevation angle. The m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different definitions of penetration loss, type and structure of a particular building and a strong dependence on elevation angle must be acknowledged when a comparison with results from [8]- [11], [13], [14] and [17] is to be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different definitions of penetration loss, type and structure of a particular building and a strong dependence on elevation angle must be acknowledged when a comparison with results from [8]- [11], [13], [14] and [17] is to be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the link budget must be carefully planned, relevant models for penetration loss are of great interest. In addition to direct measurements with a geostationary satellite [6], [7], helicopters [8]- [11], aircraft [12], airships [13], [14], crank-up towers, or cranes [12], [15], [16] can also be utilized as pseudo-satellites. Moreover, reference levels need to be obtained in different ways so that propagation conditions can be defined clearly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An up to 10 dB lower penetration loss can be found in [4] for a concrete building with common-size windows than is outlined by the minimum fit based (1). Further, slightly lower loss is predicted by the overall model in [5] where the LOS case can be considered only for high elevation angles. The model at 2.5 GHz in [6] predicts a linear rise of penetration loss from 20.7 dB to 28.5 dB for elevation angles from 25° to 90°.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, the following formulas were derived for the frequency of 2.0 GHz and a one-meter distance from a window: L PLmin, NLOS (α) = 29.4 -2.4·10 -4 (90 -α) 2.5 (4) L PLmean, NLOS (α) = 38.9 -2.4·10 -4 (90 -α) 2.5 (5) L PLmax, NLOS (α) = 48.4 -2.4·10 -4 (90 -α) 2.5 (6) where α is the elevation angle in degrees and L PL is in dB.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%