2023
DOI: 10.54209/jasmien.v3i03.384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pengaruh Bazar dan lingkungan keluarga Terhadap Minat Berwirausaha pada Mahasiswa Universitas Budi Darma

Abstract: Universitas Budi Darma always make every bazaar event the year this done For stimulate the students own entrepreneurial spirit and ready For build business Alone later after they pass. Family is the first very teach everything about life this . So is entrepreneurship . Parents job _ student This most is selling merchants _ results plant them in the market, or open business alone . And p This can said as trader . Study This aim for see how much big influence factor extrinsic and factor intrinsic student to inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On X2 , the direct influence of X2 Y is 0.438, and the indirect influence of X1  Z  Y : 0.243 x 0.389 = 0.094, then the direct influence value X2  Y is greater than the indirect influence value This means entrepreneurial motivation (Z) does not succeed in being a link between family environmental variables in influencing students' interest in entrepreneurship; the ninth hypothesis is rejected. These results align with the findings of Khairinal et al (2022), Saputra (2021) and Yanny (2023), who revealed that motivation could not function as a connecting variable between the family environment and students' interest in starting a business. The result of the direct influence of X3 Y is 0.063, and the indirect influence of X3 Z Y: 0.229 x 0.389 = 0.089, then the direct influence value X3 Y is greater than the indirect influence value This means entrepreneurial motivation (Z) does not succeed in being a connecting variable for the community environment in influencing students' entrepreneurial interest; the tenth hypothesis is rejected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On X2 , the direct influence of X2 Y is 0.438, and the indirect influence of X1  Z  Y : 0.243 x 0.389 = 0.094, then the direct influence value X2  Y is greater than the indirect influence value This means entrepreneurial motivation (Z) does not succeed in being a link between family environmental variables in influencing students' interest in entrepreneurship; the ninth hypothesis is rejected. These results align with the findings of Khairinal et al (2022), Saputra (2021) and Yanny (2023), who revealed that motivation could not function as a connecting variable between the family environment and students' interest in starting a business. The result of the direct influence of X3 Y is 0.063, and the indirect influence of X3 Z Y: 0.229 x 0.389 = 0.089, then the direct influence value X3 Y is greater than the indirect influence value This means entrepreneurial motivation (Z) does not succeed in being a connecting variable for the community environment in influencing students' entrepreneurial interest; the tenth hypothesis is rejected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, different results were found by Wulandari (2020) and Ritonga et al (2022), showing that the family environment does not impact student interest. The same results were revealed Khairinal et al (2022), Saputra (2021) and Yanny (2023)…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This entrepreneurial decision is also related to opportunity, which this research supports Arab & Sofiyabadi (2013);Bezerra Vasconcelos et al, (2022) that when there is a business opportunity, entrepreneurs are present. This research also supports the finding that entrepreneurial decisions cannot be separated from government policies in the form of technical guidance for both production and marketing aspects, access to financing for working capital and increased productivity, entrepreneurial culture (OECD, 2017) and promises independence and prosperity (Ardiyani & Kusuma, 2016;Irawati, 2022). Thus the statement that the internal and external environment has a positive and significant influence on entrepreneurial decisions (International Labor Organization, 2021;Irawati, 2022;Kuznetsova et al, 2017;Oluwadare & Oni, 2016) is a statement that has been empirically tested so that to foster interest in entrepreneurship it is necessary to strengthen aspects of the internal and external personal environment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A part from individual competence, other internal factors, namely the family environment, empirically influence entrepreneurial decisions. Studies Ardiyani & Kusuma (2016) for example, researching 100 students from the Faculty of Economics and Business, Ganesha Education University. The research results show that students' interest in entrepreneurship does not just come naturally, but rather there is family intervention.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%