Pengaruh Metallic Catalytic Converter Tembaga Berlapis Chrome Dalam Menurunkan Emisi Gas Buang Mesin Sepeda Motor Empat Langkah

Ariyanto, Sudirman Rizki; Wulandari, Retno; Suprayitno, Suprayitno; Purboputro, Pramuko Ilmu

doi:10.23917/mesin.v23i1.16604

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, copper oxide nanoparticle-based catalytic converters were tested by Prabhahar et al [4], who found that at 250°C, CO emissions were reduced by 50% and at 300°C, HC emissions were reduced by 50%. In line with the findings of previous research, Ariyanto et al [5] also proved that CO emissions were reduced by 24%, and HC emissions were reduced by 30% after using a catalytic converter made from copper-coated chrome catalytic converter on a motorcycle exhaust.…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Analyzing Transition Metal Catalytic Converter Impact on Four-Stroke Motorcycle Fuel Consumption

Ariyanto,

Nugraha,

Cahyadi

et al. 2023

JMEST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increased exhaust emissions from motor vehicles have become a major concern in efforts to reduce air pollution. One developed solution is the use of transition metallic catalytic converter (TMCC) technology in vehicle exhaust systems. This study aims to compare the fuel consumption efficiency of three types of exhaust systems, namely standard exhaust without a catalyst (STD WC), the standard exhaust with Original Equipment Manufacturer catalyst (STD OEM), and an exhaust system equipped with a Copper-Coated Chrome Metallic Catalytic Converter (TMCC CuCr). The data analysis method employed a quantitative approach by collecting fuel consumption data at each rpm and analyzing the mean and standard deviation. The research findings indicate that STD OEM has a lower average fuel consumption (0.80 liters per hour) and smaller standard deviation (0.06) compared to TMCC CuCr (0.83 liters per hour and 0.07). Although TMCC CuCr demonstrates good efficiency, STD OEM remains the best choice in terms of fuel efficiency. However, if the differences in fuel consumption and standard deviation are considered insignificant, TMCC CuCr could be a more economical alternative with its affordable price and greater material availability. Furthermore, its fuel consumption performance is not significantly different from that of STD OEM.

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Analyzing Transition Metal Catalytic Converter Impact on Four-Stroke Motorcycle Fuel Consumption

Ariyanto,

Nugraha,

Cahyadi

et al. 2023

JMEST

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This research uses the data set obtained from previous collaborative works [28]- [34]. From these works, a total of 231 data sets representing different MCC designs under various engine operating rotational speeds were collected based on six design variables.…”

Section: Data Setsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design of Metallic Catalytic Converter using Pareto Optimization to Improve Engine Performance and Exhaust Emissions

Ariyanto

Suprayitno

Wulandari

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, Metallic Catalytic Converter (MCC) is installed in motorcycle exhausts to produce the minimum CO as well as to produce the optimum engine power. The results from previous research were collected and then used to predict the best MCC design using the Artificial Neural Network Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (ANN-MOGA). In addition, the ANN parameter tuning process was also carried out using the Taguchi method to find the initial weighting and bias that is able to provide the best and the most stable performance to predict the best MCC design. The best two sets of design solutions out of 70 sets of Pareto solutions were obtained by ANN-MOGA. Those two MCC designs are the optimum emission design and the optimum multi-objective design. The verification results show that the optimum multi-objective design tends to be superior in terms of CO emissions and engine power. In terms of CO emissions, the optimum multi-objective design gets a larger S/N ratio of -10.98, while the optimum emission design only gets an S/N ratio of -11.21. Meanwhile, in terms of engine power, the optimum multi-objective design gets a larger S/N ratio of 16.13, while the optimum emission design only gets an S/N ratio of 15.86 S/N. It is in line with the ANOVA test results which show that the optimum multi-objective design is proven to be better than the optimum emission design.

show abstract

“…Meanwhile, Manojkumar et 45 [11] through their research stated that the copper catalytic converter is only good for the oxidation process. Furthermore, Ariyanto et al [12] through their research, it is found that the use of chrome-coated copper catalytic converters proved effective in reducing CO and HC emissions. The percentage reduction in CO and HC emissions is 24% and 30%, respectively.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Chrome Plated Copper Catalytic Converters on Engine Performance Was Evaluated by Chassis Dynamometer Experiment

Ariyanto

Wulandari²,

Suprayitno³

et al. 2023

mesin

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Emissions produced by motorized vehicles greatly contribute to various environmental and health problems. One technology that is currently being developed to reduce the number of emissions in the environment is the catalytic converter. This technology is proven to be able to reduce exhaust emissions well, but how big the impact on engine performance (torque and power) still needs further research. The main objective of this study was to determine the impact of using chrome plated copper (CuCr) catalytic converters on engine performance. The vehicle used in the test is a Yamaha Vixion Lightning 150 CC. Engine performance (torque and power) was measured using the Inertia Chassis Dynamometer test instrument with the SAE J1349 standard. The findings of this study indicate that the use of experimental exhaust results in a decrease in vehicle torque and power. This is certainly a compromising factor that must be accepted, considering that installing a catalyst is the same as increasing the exhaust gas flow barrier. The decrease in torque and power is still in the acceptable category, considering that the average decrease only occurs at about 5% for torque and 7% for power. All these arguments show that since the main purpose of using catalytic converters is to lower exhaust emissions, it makes engine performance lower than expected.

show abstract

Pengaruh Metallic Catalytic Converter Tembaga Berlapis Chrome Dalam Menurunkan Emisi Gas Buang Mesin Sepeda Motor Empat Langkah

Cited by 5 publications

References 11 publications

Analyzing Transition Metal Catalytic Converter Impact on Four-Stroke Motorcycle Fuel Consumption

Analyzing Transition Metal Catalytic Converter Impact on Four-Stroke Motorcycle Fuel Consumption

Design of Metallic Catalytic Converter using Pareto Optimization to Improve Engine Performance and Exhaust Emissions

The Impact of Chrome Plated Copper Catalytic Converters on Engine Performance Was Evaluated by Chassis Dynamometer Experiment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About