Pengaruh Penerapan Metode Kombinasi Ceramah, Demonstrasi Dan Latihan (Cdl) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Komputer Akuntansi Siswa Di SMK Negeri 1 Palembang Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016

Febriansyah, Febriansyah

doi:10.31851/neraca.v1i1.1166

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Meanwhile, Azmi et al (2017) Learning involves cognitive, affective and psychomotor aspects. In line with Febriansyah (2017) Learning is a process in whih individuals try to acquire knowledge, skills and complex changes and behaviors. Learning is interpreted as a process of changing behavior as a result individual interaction with the environment (Pane & Darwis Dasopang, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, there is no harm in the form of assessment of learning outcomes by using a written test and an oral test. According to Febriansyah (2017) Economics is a science that studies how individuals or communities choose how to use scarce resources to fulfill their needs as an effort to achieve prosperity. From the above opinion, it can be concluded that economics is a science that studies how individuals utilize existing natural resources.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Differences in Learning Outcomes Between Students Tested in Written Tests and Oral Tests in Economics Subjects

Puspita

Ahmad

Nurlina

2022

EEAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to determine the results of differences in learning outcomes between students who were given a written test and an oral test on economics subjects. The population in this study were all students of class X IPS, which amounted to 97 students. The sampling technique in this study used random sampling. Data collection methods used documentation and tests. The results of this research for class X IPS 1 showed that the average score of the written test results was 80-86, totaling 6 people or 18.75% of the students who took the test, and were categorized as very good. 12 students who scored 66-79 or 37.5% were categorized as good. 6 students who scored 59-65 or 18.75% were categorized as sufficient while students who got a score of 45-58 were 8 people or 24.98% were categorized as poor while in class X IPS2 students who got a score of 66-79 totaling 11 people or 34.40% were categorized as good while students who scored 59-65 totaling 11 people or 34.40% were categorized as good enough. 10 students who got a score of 40-53 or 31.20% were categorized as less good.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%