Pengurangan Resiko Bencana Melalui Analisis Kerentanan Dan Kapasitas Masyarakat Dalam Menghadapi Bencana

Abstract

Recently, the disaster risk reduction program which had been firmly enrolled by the Indonesian government, should have been a major priority and hopefully increased, either in relating with the human resource, technology, regulation. donor society or government intervention itself as the implementation-cares towards the human life. The need of "mainstreaming" disaster risk reduction involved to the scaffolding-by inserting the natural disaster risk consideration to the organization structures and middle-to-long strategic plans, to the nation strategy and policy and the sectoral-base program even to the project design of vulnerable countries to disaster impacts. The efforts of disaster risk mainstreaming should cover an analysis how the risk potency could manage the policy performance, project and program. This analysis should be followed up by taking the necessary actions to reduce the vulnerability, by putting the risk reduction integrally as of the development process and by no means to the goals itself. The disaster would be a marginal thing if the community members had the capability and capacity of anticipating the impacts well. The greater capacity the community members had in managing disasters, the smaller lost impacts infected. The Mount Merapi disaster reduction was done as a dynamic process, integrated and sustainable plans to increase the quality of steps in touch with its handling that included (1) prevention, covered all efforts of disappearing and/ or reducing any threats from disasters; (2) mitigation, covered all efforts of reducing or minimizing the disaster impacts; (3) preparedness, meant any supporting activities which might anticipate the disasters; (4) emergency response, related to the series of activity and providing aids to the survivals immediately in order to handle the damaged impacts; (5) recovery, referred to the process of assisting the survivals in order to redefine the daily roles; and (6) reconstruction, connected to the rebuilding programs of all damaged infrastructures by increasing the condition of life and the community members livelihoods sources better.

Spatial analysis of damage due to the eruption of Mount Kelud in February 2014: lessons learned for better regional planning

“…The variables used to assess the impact of the eruption of Mount Kelud in this study refer to the disaster risk framework derived from the Regulation of the Head of the National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB) with the variables of threat, vulnerability, and capacity to lahar flow. [10,[13][14][15] The analytical methods used in this study are scoring and overlay methods and map interpretation. In addition, this research uses scoring to determine the level of each component with low, medium, and high index units.…”

“…The losses caused by the 2014 eruption were damage to residential facilities, public facilities, and infrastructure. In addition, it also caused damage to 5,146 ha of paddy fields, 1,792 ha of plantation agricultural land, and 260,060 ha of fruit plantations [14].…”