2015
DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v1i2.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peningkatan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Dengan Menerapkan Metode Diskusi Kelompok Pleno Pada Mata Kuliah Evolusi Di Stkip Pgri Sumbar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the students earnestly learned certain subjects in school because they wanted to have knowledge of the material being studied. In addition, in line with the opinion of Megahati et al, (2015), heterogeneous groups provided opportunities for sharing knowledge (peer tutoring). Before the learning process began, the students were first given the task to look for references related to the material to be discussed in the group, in the form of case studies of the application of constructivism learning theory in learning.…”
Section: Dewi and Safnowandimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the students earnestly learned certain subjects in school because they wanted to have knowledge of the material being studied. In addition, in line with the opinion of Megahati et al, (2015), heterogeneous groups provided opportunities for sharing knowledge (peer tutoring). Before the learning process began, the students were first given the task to look for references related to the material to be discussed in the group, in the form of case studies of the application of constructivism learning theory in learning.…”
Section: Dewi and Safnowandimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teaching and learning activities in group discussions were not influenced by the lecturers' opinions. Free discussion was effective when the students were given the opportunity to dialogue, so they could gather the information, draw conclusions, and make self-evaluations (Megahati et al, 2015). The student seats were organized in a circle with the aim to produce mutual support and interaction between all group members, so that the discussion activities took place effectively.…”
Section: Dewi and Safnowandimentioning
confidence: 99%