2006
DOI: 10.21002/jaki.2006.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peningkatan Komunikasi Informasi Akuntansi Menggunakan Gambar Kartun

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is different finding with (7) that stated the most effective decision on liquidity, leverage, and profitability is ratios (7). There is no inconsistencies among respondents as on (6). For the next research, the emoticon face should be explore more because they are so many emoticon faces avaiable.…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is different finding with (7) that stated the most effective decision on liquidity, leverage, and profitability is ratios (7). There is no inconsistencies among respondents as on (6). For the next research, the emoticon face should be explore more because they are so many emoticon faces avaiable.…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other group, they found out that there is inconsistencies among respondents on error type 2. This error is more concerned because it is failure to stated unhealty company as healthy company while using Chernoff's schematic faces (6). The different result is found out that financial ratios are the best to put misclassification error type I and II compare to Doraemon schematic faces (7).…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of this study indicate that respondents can easily detect changes in the faces presented, even more quickly and accurately than using accounting numbers or ratios derived from these financial statements. (Febrianto & Rafdinal, 2006)using a graph to describe the company's financial status and dividing it into 4 treatment groups, based on four task complexity (accumulation, recognition, estimation, projection) and four forms of presentation (table, bar graph, line graph and circle graph). The results of these studies indicate a difference in the mean between the groups he observed or at least one different group.…”
Section: M2011-043mentioning
confidence: 99%