2019
DOI: 10.4054/mpidr-wp-2019-003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pension adequacy standards: an empirical estimation strategy and results for the United States and Germany

Abstract: Due to increasing life expectancy pension benefits and savings need to last longer, which casts doubt on the financial security of retirees. Surprisingly, what pension benefit level can be considered adequate remains unclear. In this paper, we propose an identification strategy for the estimation of pension adequacy standards. Applying a range of econometric techniques to data from the U.S. and Germany, we find that a net pension income of around 100% of the last net working life income, plus or minus 10 perce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(121 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this trade-off can be relaxed by redistribution within or across cohorts, requiring individuals to save more for their retirement imposes costs during working life that should be taken into account in the formulation of pension policy. However, assessing the adequacy of income in retirement is complicated by the diversity of labour market histories, wealth holdings, future health status, and preferences regarding consumption in retirement across the population (Dudel and Schmied, 2019;Poterba, 2015). One commonly used measure of retirement income adequacy is the income replacement rate, defined as the ratio of postretirement income (from pensions, annuitised wealth holdings, etc) to preretirement income (such as earnings during the years preceding retirement, or average earnings over the working life).…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this trade-off can be relaxed by redistribution within or across cohorts, requiring individuals to save more for their retirement imposes costs during working life that should be taken into account in the formulation of pension policy. However, assessing the adequacy of income in retirement is complicated by the diversity of labour market histories, wealth holdings, future health status, and preferences regarding consumption in retirement across the population (Dudel and Schmied, 2019;Poterba, 2015). One commonly used measure of retirement income adequacy is the income replacement rate, defined as the ratio of postretirement income (from pensions, annuitised wealth holdings, etc) to preretirement income (such as earnings during the years preceding retirement, or average earnings over the working life).…”
Section: Notementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Individuals may need less than their full pre-retirement income to maintain their level of consumption in retirement because they incur fewer work-related expenses, can devote more time to home production, generally pay less in taxes, no longer need to save for retirement, have fewer dependents, and are less likely to be servicing mortgage and other types of debt (Crawford and O'Dea, 2012;Dudel and Schmied, 2019;Munnell et al, 2015). On the other hand, uncertainty over future health and long-term care costs may necessitate a higher replacement rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%