Pension Fund Manager Tournaments and Attitudes Towards Corporate Characteristics

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between the tournament incentives of pension fund managers and the characteristics of equities they choose to hold. Using a comprehensive data set on pension fund portfolio holdings, we determine the intensity of fund manager tournaments by sorting pension funds into portfolios based on the number of concurrent managers each pension fund employs. We then investigate which corporate characteristics are preferred by each of these portfolios by estimating share selection models that include a range of corporate characteristics that are expected to shape the returns to investment in stocks over the short and long run. We find that the intensity of the tournament faced by fund managers plays a significant role in shaping preferences over corporate characteristics. Managers facing more intense tournaments exhibit significantly weaker preferences for attributes associated with long run payoffs, such as social performance and growth potential, and significantly stronger preferences for short term attributes, such as operational efficiency, when compared to managers that face weak or no tournament incentives. Copyright 2007 The Authors Journal compilation (c) 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Institutional Interest in Corporate Responsibility: Portfolio Evidence and Ethical Explanation

“…Health and safety, equal opportunities, and environment are drawn from the EIRIS. Using the approach of Graves and Waddock (1994) and Cox et al (2007), each text-grade rating for health and safety, equal opportunities and environment per sample firm is translated into a number-grade rating starting at 1 and increasing with greater performance. To arrive at a single measure for health and safety, equal opportunities, and the environment, the score on each is normalised so as to give them equal weight.…”

The Origins and Meanings of Names Describing Investment Practices that Integrate a Consideration of ESG Issues in the Academic Literature

“…Irvine 1987;Mackenzie 1998;Schwartz et al 2007) and Social Investment (e.g. Dunfee 2003;Cox et al 2007). More recently emerging names include Responsible Investment (e.g.…”

Does community and environmental responsibility affect firm risk? Evidence from UK panel data 1994-2006

“…2006). Indeed, recent evidence suggests that corporate social responsibility is expected to be costly to shareholders (Surroca & Tribo 2008), and that investors show weaker preferences for attributes such as social performance than for shorter term operational efficiency attributes (Cox et al . 2007).…”