1998
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.882230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pension Reform in the Baltics, Russia, and Other Countries of the Former Soviet Union (Bro)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably in some FSU countries, statutory old-age benefits have fallen below subsistence level. Moreover, significant arrears were reported for Georgia, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan (Castello Branco, 1998;Braithwaite, Grootaert, and Milanovic, 2000).…”
Section: Source: Based On Müller (2002b)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably in some FSU countries, statutory old-age benefits have fallen below subsistence level. Moreover, significant arrears were reported for Georgia, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan (Castello Branco, 1998;Braithwaite, Grootaert, and Milanovic, 2000).…”
Section: Source: Based On Müller (2002b)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early transition years, high inflation and severe fiscal imbalances eroded the real value of retirement pensions, flattened the benefit structure even more and led to accumulated arrears. In most FSU countries, maintaining a minimal income floor soon became the governments' overriding objective, turning pension systems into crude safety nets (Castello Branco, 1998;Lindeman, Rutkowski, and Sluchynskyy 2000). Nowadays only Georgia is still paying out flat-rate retirement benefits regardless of the employment record (see Table 2, below).…”
Section: The Role Of Non-contributory Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the necessity of reforming the existing PAYG pension systems was urgent and many countries-initiated transformations from the very beginning of their independence. Branco et al (1998) analyzed reforms of the pension systems in the Post-Soviet Union countries. According to the study, two main types of policies have been identified to tackle the financial challenges that pension systems faced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the fully funded pillar (first pillar) is dominant and the guaranteed minimum pension is provided by government to ensure the conditions of the poor. This approach was also referred as the Australian-Chilean pension system (Branco, 1998). Schwarz (2014) describes the expected projections of the pension systems challenges in Eastern European and Central Asian countries.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. 1998 for a comprehensive review; Box 3 includes relevant case studies.18 See e.g.,de Castello Branco (1998) for an overview of pension reforms in the BRO countries.19 In Western Europe, reforms proposals have generally centered on modifications to the P AYG system while there has been resistance to more systemic reforms such as partial prefunding of the PAYG system or mandatory private pensions savings (see e.g. IMP 1997c for a discussion of reform proposals in Germany).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%