2004
DOI: 10.1080/10920277.2004.10596154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pensions and Capital Structure

Abstract: This paper considers the pension plan as part of the capital structure of the sponsoring employer. This enables lessons from financial theory concerning capital structure to be used to answer the question, "What assets should a pension fund hold?" The standard Modigliani-Miller framework is expanded on to consider the implications of corporate tax. This leads to the conclusion that bond investment for pension plans has tangible advantages over holding risky assets (e.g., equities). The paper considers a case s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thomas (1988) and Frank (2002) found some modest US evidence in favour of the tax arbitrage strategy, while, Bartram (2018) found no evidence for the tax arbitrage strategy for the US. In the UK Boots moved to 100% bonds in 2000 (Ralfe, Speed, and Palin 2004) in accordance with tax arbitrage motive.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomas (1988) and Frank (2002) found some modest US evidence in favour of the tax arbitrage strategy, while, Bartram (2018) found no evidence for the tax arbitrage strategy for the US. In the UK Boots moved to 100% bonds in 2000 (Ralfe, Speed, and Palin 2004) in accordance with tax arbitrage motive.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%