Penyebaran Dialek Melayu Di Langkawi: Analisis Geolinguistik (The Distribution of Malay Dialects in Langkawi: A Geolinguistic Analysis)

Jalaluddin, Nor Hashimah; Halim, Maizatul Hafizah Abdul; Radzi, Harishon; Kasdan, Junaini

doi:10.17576/gema-2017-1704-11

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Despite her contribution to illustrating the spread of dialect in the state of Pahang, Collins (1989Collins ( , 1999, on the other hand, rejected this method upon adhering to Jalaluddin et al (2017) and Hamzah et al (2014) due to the similar concept of political labelling. Omar (1977), Hussein (1973), and Karim and Ibrahim (1977) divided Pahang into groups based on their phonetic distinctions.…”

Section: Problem Statement and Research Objectivementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Omar (1977), Hussein (1973), and Karim and Ibrahim (1977) divided Pahang into groups based on their phonetic distinctions. However, these studies were impressionistic (Jalaluddin et al, 2017) as they relied on isolated phonological findings and dismissed the comparative linguistics approach. The comparison of interdialectal or subdialect illustrates the linguistic properties in the area.…”

Section: Problem Statement and Research Objectivementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reconstruction of Proto Central of Pahang River Phoneme

Zaidi¹,

Aman²,

Hamid³

2023

JSSH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study reconstructed the proto-phoneme of consonants for a subdialect in the central basin of the Pahang River. The length of this river is 459 kilometres, and the area in the centre part of the river was selected to perform comparative linguistics observations. Five research sites were selected for this study purpose, namely Kuala Tembeling (KT), Lada (LDA), Jeransang (JRG), Kedondong (DDG), and Bukit Nikmat (BMT), based on their distinctive phonological characteristics. The research sites were visited twice to ensure the authenticity of the gathered data. The data were screened to extract cognate words using Crowley’s framework. Crowley’s sound correspondence set (SCS) was employed to evaluate and extract proto-phonemes. After the phonemes were retrieved, the reconstructed proto-phoneme of Adelaar was used as a point of comparison. The findings revealed that Proto-Centre Pahang river (PCPr) has 18 ancient consonant phonemes (*p, *b, *t, *d, *k, *ɡ, *m, *n, *ɲ, *ŋ, *l, *s, *ɣ, *h, *c, *ɟ, *w, and *j). The distribution of these consonants is diverse and depends on the consonant type. A vocalic feature of PCPr, such as vowels and diphthongs, should be the subject of future discussion to arrive at definitive conclusions regarding phonological changes between PCPr and Proto-Malayic (PM).

show abstract

Section: Problem Statement and Research Objectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Problem Statement and Research Objectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Reconstruction of Proto Central of Pahang River Phoneme

Zaidi¹,

Aman²,

Hamid³

2023

JSSH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sometimes they asked for additional time to allow each group member to present their opinion and provide feedback on the opinion of their fellow group members. The increase in the mean score of attitudes for the treatment group in learning Malay grammar after using the Jigsaw II technique is seen as convincing teachers to diversify their strategies to strengthen the student's knowledge and skills in achieving a good level of grammar proficiency (Jalaluddin et al, 2010).…”

Section: Differences In Students' Attitudes Towards Learning Malay Gr...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The problem with the attitudes of students in learning Malay is also caused by the teacher's pedagogy (Mahamod, 2011). Jalaluddin et al (2010) found that students became bored and started to lose interest in learning the Malay language due to the same Malay language teaching activities from the primary to secondary level. The study found that almost 20 per cent of the sample male students showed a negative attitude towards the Malay language due to the curriculum being very broad and often changing in grammar.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The use of Jigsaw II technique in Malay grammar learning

Ahmad

Zainal

2023

Indonesian J. Appl. Linguist.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Jigsaw II technique has been found to be effective in teaching and learning grammar based on cooperative learning. Therefore, this study was conducted to examine the effect of the use of the Jigsaw II technique on Form Four students’ attitudes and achievement in Malay grammar learning. Sixty-two students from two boarding schools in Kubang Pasu district, Kedah, Malaysia, were selected to participate in the study. They were divided into a treatment group and a control group. Thirty-one students of the treatment group used the Jigsaw II technique, while thirty-one students of the control group used the Gallery Walk technique. Both groups were given pre-test and post-test. Pre-attitude and post-attitude questionnaires were given to the treatment group only. Data was collected and analysed quantitatively using paired sample t-test, independent sample t-test, and simple linear regression test. The results showed a significant difference in achievement and attitudes for the treatment group in learning Malay grammar after using the Jigsaw II technique. The analysis also showed that the student’s attitude also influenced their achievement in learning Malay grammar based on the Jigsaw II technique. In conclusion, language teachers should choose and diversify cooperative learning techniques, such as the Jigsaw II technique, as this technique can also influence students’ achievement and attitudes in grammar learning.

show abstract