2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21093142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

People Lifting Patterns—A Reference Dataset for Practitioners

Abstract: Many health professionals do not use correct person transfer techniques in their daily practice. This results in damage to the paraspinal musculature over time, resulting in lower back pain and injuries. In this work, we propose an approach for the accurate multimodal measurement of people lifting and related motion patterns for ergonomic education regarding the application of correct patient transfer techniques. Several examples of person lifting were recorded and processed through accurate instrumentation an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from OptiTrack were streamed to the Python interface through the Motive 2.0 Optical Motion Capture Software and OptiTrack’s NatNet SDK. The conventional full-body biomechanical model with 39 markers ( Fig 1 , right) was used to capture joint trajectories (see Figure 2 in [ 34 ] for the placement of the entire marker set). The collected data did not contain any identifiable personal information of the participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data from OptiTrack were streamed to the Python interface through the Motive 2.0 Optical Motion Capture Software and OptiTrack’s NatNet SDK. The conventional full-body biomechanical model with 39 markers ( Fig 1 , right) was used to capture joint trajectories (see Figure 2 in [ 34 ] for the placement of the entire marker set). The collected data did not contain any identifiable personal information of the participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, there were only four trials (or 0.13% of the total trials) that contained joints relevant to the ROM calculation that had frames with a visibility index of 0.5 or below. 2 in [34] for the placement of the entire marker set). The collected data did not contain any identifiable personal information of the participants.…”
Section: Fig 1 (Left)mentioning
confidence: 99%