2007
DOI: 10.1080/10242690600924661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘People or Prairie Chickens’ Revisited: Stated Preferences With Explicit Non‐market Trade‐offs

Abstract: Urban sprawl has led to increasing prevalence of endangered species on military training facilities throughout the United States. Provisions of the Endangered Species Act imply encroachment interrupts military training activities and may affect military readiness. Endangered species protection and military training are competing non-market goods. This paper reports the estimates of public valuation of military training activities incorporating explicit tradeoffs associated with endangered species protection. O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to be consistent with market settings in which consumers always have the option not to purchase anything, in most choice experiments, one of the options in each choice task always is a 'no purchase' (in CEs for private goods) or 'status quo' (in CEs for public goods) alternative. Figure 1 reports example choice tasks from choice experiment surveys used in three very different settings: to estimate the demand for quality-differentiated beef (Lusk and Schroeder 2004); to determine the public's preferences for public lands' use for endangered species protection versus military training (Smith and McKee 2007); and to estimate preferences for a cervical cancer screening program (Ryan and Wordsworth 2000). The common 3 [Insert Figure 1 about here] features of the relevant experimental designs are (1) choice options described in terms of their characteristics, termed attributes, which vary across options; (2) the offer of more than two options from which respondents may choose; (3) information about a price or cost attribute for each option (which enables researchers to estimate willingness to pay); and (4) the presence of a no purchase/no policy change (status quo) option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to be consistent with market settings in which consumers always have the option not to purchase anything, in most choice experiments, one of the options in each choice task always is a 'no purchase' (in CEs for private goods) or 'status quo' (in CEs for public goods) alternative. Figure 1 reports example choice tasks from choice experiment surveys used in three very different settings: to estimate the demand for quality-differentiated beef (Lusk and Schroeder 2004); to determine the public's preferences for public lands' use for endangered species protection versus military training (Smith and McKee 2007); and to estimate preferences for a cervical cancer screening program (Ryan and Wordsworth 2000). The common 3 [Insert Figure 1 about here] features of the relevant experimental designs are (1) choice options described in terms of their characteristics, termed attributes, which vary across options; (2) the offer of more than two options from which respondents may choose; (3) information about a price or cost attribute for each option (which enables researchers to estimate willingness to pay); and (4) the presence of a no purchase/no policy change (status quo) option.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%