2010
DOI: 10.1375/brim.11.3.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

People Under 50 With Acquired Brain Injury Living in Residential Aged Care

Abstract: Objectives:The aim of this article is to describe the characteristics, needs and preferences of people under 50 with an acquired brain injury (ABI) living in residential aged care in Victoria and examine implications for service development.Participants:Sixty-one people under 50 with an ABI living in residential aged care in the state of Victoria.Measures:Care and Needs Scale, Community Integration Questionnaire, Overt Behaviour Scale, Health of the Nation Outcome Scale — ABI Version, Role Checklist, Resident … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding echoes experiences reported previously (O'Reilly & Pryor, 2002), and highlights the need for greater flexibility and responsiveness in individual care pathways to provide increased opportunity for movement between RAC, rehabilitation and community living. Many of the challenges and potential solutions for supporting people with neurological disability to live a lifestyle of choice have been highlighted by Winkler et al (2007), suggesting the need for a better integrated service system. Such a system would enable opportunities to better overcome issues around complexity of governance, policy and funding arrangements for health, aged care and disability support services that vary across levels of government, communication between responsible agencies, and eligibility and funding criteria which limit access for individuals whose support needs cut across several sectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding echoes experiences reported previously (O'Reilly & Pryor, 2002), and highlights the need for greater flexibility and responsiveness in individual care pathways to provide increased opportunity for movement between RAC, rehabilitation and community living. Many of the challenges and potential solutions for supporting people with neurological disability to live a lifestyle of choice have been highlighted by Winkler et al (2007), suggesting the need for a better integrated service system. Such a system would enable opportunities to better overcome issues around complexity of governance, policy and funding arrangements for health, aged care and disability support services that vary across levels of government, communication between responsible agencies, and eligibility and funding criteria which limit access for individuals whose support needs cut across several sectors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the planning and assessment process for the YPIRAC initiative, information was obtained about the characteristics, support needs and preferences of people under 50 years of age residing in RAC in Victoria (Winkler et al, 2007). The planning and assessment process found that most young people in RAC have a brain injury (58%) and the specific characteristics, support needs and preferences of this subgroup have been described previously (Winkler, Sloan, & Callaway, 2010). This study found that young people living in RAC with ABI are a diverse group with a complex range of health and support needs that are not adequately met within RAC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Many people with ABI (44%) required the highest level of support, indicating they could not be left alone, while 26% could be left for part of the day and overnight. Eighty-one per cent of people with ABI and people from their primary support networks indicated that they would like to explore alternative accommodation and support options, while 19% people indicated that they would prefer to remain living in the current RAC facility (Winkler et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) (Willer et al, 1994) has become a widely used and comprehensive measure of community integration following ABI (Ritchie, Wright-St Clair, Keogh & Gray, 2014;Sander et al, 1999;Seale et al, 2002). The CIQ has been used extensively in occupational therapy research and practice (Burleigh et al, 1998;Huebner et al, 2003;Kim & Colantonio, 2010;Parveneh & Cocks, 2012;Sloan, Callaway, Winkler, McKinley & Ziino, 2012;Sloan, Winkler & Anson, 2007;Sloan et al, 2004Sloan et al, , 2009bWinkler, Farnworth, Sloan, Brown & Callaway, 2010a;Winkler, Sloan & Callaway, 2010b). The use of the CIQ has also expanded to other population groups including people with physical disability (Hirsh, Braden, Craggs & Jensen, 2011), spinal cord injury (Gontovsky et al, 2009;Kratz, Chadd, Jensen, Kehn & Kroll, 2015), aphasia (Dalemans, de Witte, Beurskens, van den Heuvel & Wade, 2010), brain tumours (Kaplan, 2000), neurodegenerative conditions including Multiple Sclerosis (Negahban, Fattahizadeh, Salehi, Majdinasab & Mazaheri, 2013) and burn injuries (Esselman et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%