2017
DOI: 10.1177/1359105317714318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

People with a body mass index ⩾30 under-report their dietary intake: A systematic review

Abstract: Under-reporting of total energy intake is a common and well-known source of measurement error in dietary assessment, and evidence suggests that this bias is particularly significant in obese individuals. After a multi-stage selection process of eligible papers, this literature review appraised 34 papers detailing the accuracy of self-reported dietary intake in people with an obese body mass index (BMI ⩾ 30). The available literature to date shows that having a body mass index ⩾30 is associated with significant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
72
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
7
72
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not directly observe any individual's type; however, we can draw upon prior literature to infer types of consumers who are more likely to have low levels of information. In particular, the review article of Wehling and Lusher (2017) documents that individuals with BMI greater than or equal to 30 (in the obese range) systematically underreport calories consumed in meals, while there is no such pattern for individuals in healthy weight ranges. 34 We thus use observed BMI as a proxy for individuals' types when exploring the effects of calorie labels on life satisfaction.…”
Section: Understanding Why Calorie Labels Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do not directly observe any individual's type; however, we can draw upon prior literature to infer types of consumers who are more likely to have low levels of information. In particular, the review article of Wehling and Lusher (2017) documents that individuals with BMI greater than or equal to 30 (in the obese range) systematically underreport calories consumed in meals, while there is no such pattern for individuals in healthy weight ranges. 34 We thus use observed BMI as a proxy for individuals' types when exploring the effects of calorie labels on life satisfaction.…”
Section: Understanding Why Calorie Labels Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it may be tempting to use additional demographic characteristics to define types,Wehling and Lusher (2017) document that there is no consistent pattern of differences in beliefs across other demographic characteristics such as race, age, and gender.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not know whether the sample represents physically active students or not, and the PAL level used is arbitrary in order to allow the application of cut-off calculations. In addition to the known limitations in reliability imposed by self-reporting [32,33], generalizability is also limited by the fact that data was collected during a limited period each spring, not allowing to take into account intra-annual variations. Moreover, only two days of data reporting from each student were included (one weekday and one weekend-day) which is probable to have an effect on the absolute values, although most likely consistently over the time-period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Rennie et al . ; Wehling & Lusher ). Measurement bias can also occur with underreporting of certain types of foods, which may be more likely for foods high in fat and/or sugars (Heitmann et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, analysis of food diary records, although often considered the 'gold standard' method, is still subject to measurement error. A well-documented limitation is mis-or underreporting, particularly in overweight and obese populations (Drevon et al 1998;Rennie et al 2007;Wehling & Lusher 2017). Measurement bias can also occur with underreporting of certain types of foods, which may be more likely for foods high in fat and/or sugars (Heitmann et al 2000) as subjects may report intakes more in line with those that are socially desirable or better comply with dietary advice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%