2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01181.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

People with an intellectual disability living in an intentional community

Abstract: Results confirm those from earlier studies of intentional communities and suggest that positive outcomes derive from the absence of the overt subordination of residents to staff, the facilitation of friendship with other people with an ID, high levels of meaningful employment and a sense of community. These factors contrast with the experience of living in small homes funded on a contractual basis by public authorities, in which cost pressures reduce wage levels for staff resulting in difficulties in retaining… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). The unique role of intentional communities is identified, with findings suggesting that opportunities for friendships are enhanced by proximity to other people with intellectual disabilities and the absence of formalised staffing (Randell & Cumella ). The fact that individuals live together in the same setting does not, however, guarantee a richer social life, rather the evidence suggests that people enjoy their social life more in settings that encourage freedom of choice and flexibility (Duvdevany & Arar ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). The unique role of intentional communities is identified, with findings suggesting that opportunities for friendships are enhanced by proximity to other people with intellectual disabilities and the absence of formalised staffing (Randell & Cumella ). The fact that individuals live together in the same setting does not, however, guarantee a richer social life, rather the evidence suggests that people enjoy their social life more in settings that encourage freedom of choice and flexibility (Duvdevany & Arar ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers, after explaining the interview's purpose and procedures, asked potential participants to restate what the study was about and what they were being asked to do to determine if the individuals truly understood and were giving informed consent (e.g. Randell & Cumella 2009).…”
Section: Methods Used To Increase the Validity Reliability And Volunmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers (e.g. Randell & Cumella 2009) used pictures and symbols during interviews to assist participants in understanding questions and communicating responses.…”
Section: Methods Used To Increase the Validity Reliability And Volunmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In exploring friendship activity, they found the setting in which people live to be more significant in determining the shape of activities with friends than personal characteristics and so argue that interventions at a system level are also necessary. This conclusion is corroborated by ethnographic research carried out within an ‘intentional community’, that is one based on a co‐operative model with explicit common values (Randell & Cumella, ). Such a living arrangement provided good opportunities for friendship due to the explicit importance and promotion of community and an absence of staff/resident power relationships.…”
Section: Factors Associated With Dealing With Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%