Intellectual disability (ID) is characterized by a reduction in general mental abilities such as reasoning, problem-solving, planning, abstract thinking, judgement, academic learning and learning from experience (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). In the literature on this subject, people with ID are described as socializing mainly with the primary family and are thus separated from the rest of the population. Many are reliant on family or society services, and they have limited access to information and opportunities for communication (Wilson & Frawley, 2016). Thus, they have fewer role models in the areas of sexual expression and behaviour than people without ID. Attitudes of family members and service providers are therefore assumed to be highly prescriptive (McConkey & Ryan, 2001; Swango-Wilson, 2010). Historically, two perspectives have characterized how sexuality in people with ID is viewed: they are either seen as eternal children without sexual feelings and needs, or seen as sexually promiscuous, potentially dangerous people who need to be supervised because they are unable to control themselves (McCarthy, 1999;