2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.01.10.426132
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PepNN: a deep attention model for the identification of peptide binding sites

Abstract: Protein-peptide interactions play a fundamental role in facilitating many cellular processes, but remain underexplored experimentally and difficult to model computationally. Here, we introduce PepNN-Struct and PepNN-Seq, structure and sequence-based approaches for the prediction of peptide binding sites on a protein given the sequence of a peptide ligand. The models make use of a novel reciprocal attention module that is able to better reflect biochemical realities of peptides undergoing conformational changes… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We additionally compared CAMP with other methods on several representative benchmark data sets (Supplementary Table 4) that were originally used to evaluate the performance of peptide docking and detecting "hotspots" at protein interface 34,[39][40][41][42] . As shown in Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: New Insights By Characterizing Binding Residues On Peptidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We additionally compared CAMP with other methods on several representative benchmark data sets (Supplementary Table 4) that were originally used to evaluate the performance of peptide docking and detecting "hotspots" at protein interface 34,[39][40][41][42] . As shown in Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: New Insights By Characterizing Binding Residues On Peptidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not observe inferior performance metrics, indicating that there is no bias (see Figure S2). Unfortunately, we could not calculate these types of results for the other methods, but for PepNN, that shows a similar trend (see Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…or structural (e.g., solvent-accessible surface area, secondary structure type, etc.) descriptors fed into a machine learning model to score each amino acid for belonging to a binding site. End-to-end methods operate directly with protein sequences , or structures by taking advantage of deep learning methods capable of learning features during training. With a continuously growing amount of structural data, it becomes possible to develop more robust methods using end-to-end deep learning approaches that work directly with spatial structures of protein complexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model architecture untilized in GDockScore builds upon the parallel embedding architecture utilized by Abdin et al (Abdin et al 2021) and protein graph attention developed by Ingraham et al (Ingraham et al n.d.). Details of the model input representation are available in the Methods section.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%