2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2018.12.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pepperpot emittance measurements of ion beams from an electron beam ion source

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These settings have no impact on the emittance values and each point is obtained with same quad setting and constant beam current intensity. It can be seen in figure 12 that the 2D Gaussian fit gives a more consistent result with reduced fluctuations compared to the linear fitting of rms-emittance and the usual threshold variation algorithm [26]. The 2D Gaussian fit has the advantage that it is less dependent on the offset that some data may have and on the local noise fluctuations.…”
Section: Data Analysis For the Allison Type Emittance Metermentioning
confidence: 90%
“…These settings have no impact on the emittance values and each point is obtained with same quad setting and constant beam current intensity. It can be seen in figure 12 that the 2D Gaussian fit gives a more consistent result with reduced fluctuations compared to the linear fitting of rms-emittance and the usual threshold variation algorithm [26]. The 2D Gaussian fit has the advantage that it is less dependent on the offset that some data may have and on the local noise fluctuations.…”
Section: Data Analysis For the Allison Type Emittance Metermentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The image of the pepper-pot device generated by an MCP and phosphor screen contains not only signals created by charged beams but also background noise which stems from the dark current of the CMOS sensor, blur characteristics of the phosphor screen, secondary particles scattered at the mask, and ambient light partially reflected by metallic surfaces of surrounding structures. Several previous image processing studies were performed without proper background noise rejection [22], [23], [24], [25]. The noise that is not cleanly removed causes inaccurate results of the phase-space distribution of the beam as it is considered as the beam signal during the reconstruction stage.…”
Section: Image Processing and Noise Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pepper-pot method was originally proposed as a method to measure the beam emittance and is constructed with a pepper-pot plate and a position-sensitive detector [38,39]. Although many methods have been developed including the quadrupole scan and the optical diffraction/transition radiation interference contrast, the pepperpot method remains a powerful technique applied for phase space structure measurements [40][41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Pepper-pot-type Phase Space Analyser (Ppsa)mentioning
confidence: 99%