Abstract:Heat shock protein (Hsp) 40s play essential roles in cellular processes by cooperating with Hsp70 proteins. Hsp40 proteins recognize non-native polypeptides, deliver these peptides to Hsp70 proteins, and stimulate the ATPase activity of Hsp70 proteins to facilitate the correct folding of the polypeptides. We have determined the crystal structures of the C-terminal peptide-binding domain of human Hsp40 Hdj1 (CTD) and of its complex with the C-terminal octapeptide of human Hsp70, (634')GPTIEEVD(641'). CTD exists… Show more
“…To date, the structures of the C-terminal, substrate-binding regions of these proteins have not been solved. Within the Hsp40 family of proteins, the C-terminal domains of the yeast Sis1 (Sha et al 2000) and human Hdj1 (DNAJAB1) protein (Suzuki et al 2010) have been crystallized and characterized.Fig. 3Reactivity of anti-DnaJ monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with human DNAJA proteins.…”
Hsp40 proteins of bacterial and human origin are suspected to be involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It has been shown that sera of RA patients contain increased levels of antibodies directed to bacterial and human Hsp40s. The aim of this work was to explore immunological similarities between the bacterial (DnaJ) and human (DNAJA1 and DNAJA2) Hsp40 proteins in relation to their possible involvement in the RA. Using polyclonal antibodies directed against a full-length DnaJ or its domains, against DNAJA1 and DNAJA2, as well as monoclonal anti-DnaJ antibodies, we found immunological similarities between the bacterial and human Hsp40s. Both ELISA and Western blotting showed that these similarities were not restricted to the conserved J domains but were also present in the C-terminal variable regions. We also found a positive correlation between the levels of the anti-DnaJ and anti-DNAJA1 antibodies in the sera of RA patients. This finding supports the molecular mimicry hypothesis that human Hsp40 could be the targets of antibodies originally directed against bacterial DnaJ in RA.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12192-013-0407-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
“…To date, the structures of the C-terminal, substrate-binding regions of these proteins have not been solved. Within the Hsp40 family of proteins, the C-terminal domains of the yeast Sis1 (Sha et al 2000) and human Hdj1 (DNAJAB1) protein (Suzuki et al 2010) have been crystallized and characterized.Fig. 3Reactivity of anti-DnaJ monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with human DNAJA proteins.…”
Hsp40 proteins of bacterial and human origin are suspected to be involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It has been shown that sera of RA patients contain increased levels of antibodies directed to bacterial and human Hsp40s. The aim of this work was to explore immunological similarities between the bacterial (DnaJ) and human (DNAJA1 and DNAJA2) Hsp40 proteins in relation to their possible involvement in the RA. Using polyclonal antibodies directed against a full-length DnaJ or its domains, against DNAJA1 and DNAJA2, as well as monoclonal anti-DnaJ antibodies, we found immunological similarities between the bacterial and human Hsp40s. Both ELISA and Western blotting showed that these similarities were not restricted to the conserved J domains but were also present in the C-terminal variable regions. We also found a positive correlation between the levels of the anti-DnaJ and anti-DNAJA1 antibodies in the sera of RA patients. This finding supports the molecular mimicry hypothesis that human Hsp40 could be the targets of antibodies originally directed against bacterial DnaJ in RA.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12192-013-0407-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
“…Such mechanisms that act to target Sis1 and its clients to such centers, coupled with the diversion away from productive pathways via the Sis1:EEVD(Hsp70) interaction discussed here, are complementary in promoting protein homeostasis. Interestingly, as the human Sis1 ortholog also interacts with EEVD(Hsp70) [30] such mechanisms may well be conserved.…”
Unlike other Hsp70 molecular chaperones, those of the eukaryotic cytosol have four residues, EEVD, at their C-termini. EEVD(Hsp70) binds adaptor proteins of the Hsp90 chaperone system and mitochondrial membrane preprotein receptors, thereby facilitating processing of Hsp70-bound clients through protein folding and translocation pathways. Among J-protein co-chaperones functioning in these pathways Sis1 is unique, as it also binds the EEVD(Hsp70) motif. However, little is known about the role of the Sis1:EEVD(Hsp70) interaction. We found that deletion of EEVD(Hsp70) abolished the ability of Sis1, but not the ubiquitous J-protein Ydj1, to partner with Hsp70 in in vitro protein refolding. Sis1 co-chaperone activity with Hsp70ΔEEVD was restored upon substitution of a glutamic acid of the J-domain. Structural analysis revealed that this key glutamic acid, which is not present in Ydj1, forms a salt bridge with an arginine of the immediately adjacent glycine-rich region. Thus, restoration of Sis1 in vitro activity suggests that intramolecular interaction(s) between the J-domain and glycine-rich region controls co-chaperone activity, which is optimal only when Sis1 interacts with the EEVD(Hsp70) motif. Yet, we found that disruption of the Sis1:EEVD(Hsp70) interaction enhances the ability of Sis1 to substitute for Ydj1 in vivo. Our results are consistent with the idea that interaction of Sis1 with EEVD(Hsp70) minimizes transfer of Sis1-bound clients to Hsp70s that are primed for client transfer to folding and translocation pathways by their preassociation with EEVD-binding adaptor proteins. These interactions may be one means by which cells triage Ydj1- and Sis1-bound clients to productive and quality control pathways, respectively.
“…enon (77)(78)(79)(80)(81). Interestingly, the unstructured C-terminal sequences of Hsp70, including the EEVD motif, have been shown to play an inhibitory role in the regulation of the Hsp70 ATPase cycle (76,79).…”
Co-chaperones containing tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domains enable cooperation between Hsp70 and Hsp90 to maintain cellular proteostasis. Although the details of the molecular interactions between some TPR domains and heat shock proteins are known, we describe a novel mechanism by which Tomm34 interacts with and coordinates Hsp70 activities. In contrast to the previously defined Hsp70/Hsp90-organizing protein (Hop), Tomm34 interaction is dependent on the Hsp70 chaperone cycle. Tomm34 binds Hsp70 in a complex process; anchorage of the Hsp70 C terminus by the TPR1 domain is accompanied by additional contacts formed exclusively in the ATP-bound state of Hsp70 resulting in a high affinity entropically driven interaction. Tomm34 induces structural changes in determinants within the Hsp70-lid subdomain and modulates Hsp70/Hsp40-mediated refolding and Hsp40-stimulated Hsp70 ATPase activity. Because Tomm34 recruits Hsp90 through its TPR2 domain, we propose a model in which Tomm34 enables Hsp70/Hsp90 scaffolding and influences the Hsp70 chaperone cycle, providing an additional role for co-chaperones that contain multiple TPR domains in regulating protein homeostasis. Molecular & Cellular
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
