2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08464-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peptide biomarkers used for the selective breeding of a complex polygenic trait in honey bees

Abstract: We present a novel way to select for highly polygenic traits. For millennia, humans have used observable phenotypes to selectively breed stronger or more productive livestock and crops. Selection on genotype, using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and genome profiling, is also now applied broadly in livestock breeding programs; however, selection on protein/peptide or mRNA expression markers has not yet been proven useful. Here we demonstrate the utility of protein markers to select for disease-resistant… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table III shows the estimates for the variance components and the resulting heritabilities and repeatability of HB recorded with FKB*. As expected, heritability for the average HB score of two records (0.37 ± 0.25) was higher than the one estimated with the repeatability model (0.23 ± 0.16), but it is smaller compared to the value of 0.65 ± 0.61 reported by Harbo and Harris (1999) and to the values of 0.56 and 0.57 recently published by Guarna et al (2017). The higher heritability is explained by the fact that in the average model, the dependent variable was the average of two HB measures.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Two Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Table III shows the estimates for the variance components and the resulting heritabilities and repeatability of HB recorded with FKB*. As expected, heritability for the average HB score of two records (0.37 ± 0.25) was higher than the one estimated with the repeatability model (0.23 ± 0.16), but it is smaller compared to the value of 0.65 ± 0.61 reported by Harbo and Harris (1999) and to the values of 0.56 and 0.57 recently published by Guarna et al (2017). The higher heritability is explained by the fact that in the average model, the dependent variable was the average of two HB measures.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Two Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Acc03527.1 ( AGAMOUS-like ) is located very close to the QTL on LG3 in P1 for Psa_score_Field and an ammonium transporter gene has been recently shown to be involved in stem rust resistance in wheat 77 . Our study therefore provide new resource for candidate RNA-biomarkers for predicting tolerance in kiwifruit field breeding nurseries that can lead to improve the speed of selective breeding of multi-genic trait 78 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We kept honey bee colonies at four separate apiaries in Greater Vancouver, Canada, and performed hygienic testing as previously described (22). All hygienic testing, sampling and odor assays were completed during the summer of 2017.…”
Section: Honey Bee Colonies and Hygienic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an effective defense against major brood diseases, including chalkbrood (Ascosphaera apis) (17,18), American foulbrood (Paenibacillus larvae) (13,19), and the devastating varroa mite (Varroa destructor) (19)(20)(21). When highly hygienic colonies are inoculated with these pests or pathogens, they are less likely to develop clinical symptoms than non-hygienic hives (19,22,23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation