1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-77814-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peptide Receptors and Signal Transduction in the Digestive Tract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 233 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work demonstrates that replacement of histidine 178 by arginine in the human VIP1 receptor results in constitutive activation of the receptor with respect to cAMP production, which constitutes its signaling pathway (35). In contrast, the wild type VIP receptor appears to be truly silent in the absence of VIP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This work demonstrates that replacement of histidine 178 by arginine in the human VIP1 receptor results in constitutive activation of the receptor with respect to cAMP production, which constitutes its signaling pathway (35). In contrast, the wild type VIP receptor appears to be truly silent in the absence of VIP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Although several studies have long been reported regarding the pharmacology of analogs of VIP and related peptides (40 -43), no systematic evaluation of the functional and structural role of every residues of VIP has been yet performed since the cloning of the two VIP receptor subtypes VPAC 1 and VPAC 2 (44). Moreover most previous studies were performed using VIP receptors from rodents although it is clear that there are important differences between species in the pharmacology of VIP receptors (8,15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chicken [Arg 16 ]secretin, although it discriminates between rat VPAC 1 and VPAC 2 receptors, has a high affinity for rat secretin receptor (59). Moreover, it has a rather weak affinity for the human VPAC 1 receptor (60), in line with the important differences between species in the pharmacology of VPAC 1 receptors (15,44 ]VIP (1-7)/GRF (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) has an important selectivity for VPAC 1 receptor but its possible interaction with GRF receptors was not directly evaluated (61). In this context, the highly selective human VPAC 1 receptor agonist developed in this study by rationale combination of three mutations in VIP itself constitutes henceforth the most operative pharmacological tool derived from VIP for characterizing VPAC 1 receptor-mediated events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No hybridization signal was observed in the HT29 cell line, derived from a human colon adenocarcinoma (Fig. 4), and in human liver (data not shown), both devoid of galanin receptors (4). Thus, the heterogeneity of hybridizing species in various tissues may reflect either multiple genes or different alternative RNA splicing forms.…”
Section: Domains Andmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…2 and 3). Galanin exerts its actions via binding to specific membrane receptors (4). Biochemical and molecular studies, performed in brain and pancreas, indicate that the galanin receptor is a glycoprotein of 54 kDa (5)(6)(7) coupled to the inhibitory guanine nucleotide binding (G) protein Gi, identified as Gil, Gi2, and Gi3 in pancreatic 83 cells (8,9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%