1987
DOI: 10.1002/bip.360260012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peptides in membranes: Lipid-induced secondary structure of substance P

Abstract: SynopsisSubstance P (Arg-Pro-Lys-Pro-Gln-Gln-Phe-Phe-Gly-Leu-Met-NH2), a neuromodulator involved in the transmission of pain information, exerts its biological effects by binding to membrane-embedded protein receptors. The influence of membrane lipids on neuropeptide conformation may be critical to these processes. We have characterized in detail the complexes formed between substance P and sodium dodecykulfate (SDS), lysophosphatidylglycerol, and lysophosphatidylcholine micelles. CD spectra of substance P dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
80
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even the differences between the anionic interface (in SDS) and the zwitterionic interface (in DPC) do not cause significant differences in the conformation of the bound peptides. This result is consistent with previous studies on SP 11,12 and other peptides, 18 which suggested structures of peptides in the presence of lipids are independent of lipid headgroup type. The differences in the surface charge do affect the partition of SP and [Tyr 8 ]SP, as well as NKA and [Tyr 0 ]NKA, in these micelles as discussed in an earlier section.…”
supporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even the differences between the anionic interface (in SDS) and the zwitterionic interface (in DPC) do not cause significant differences in the conformation of the bound peptides. This result is consistent with previous studies on SP 11,12 and other peptides, 18 which suggested structures of peptides in the presence of lipids are independent of lipid headgroup type. The differences in the surface charge do affect the partition of SP and [Tyr 8 ]SP, as well as NKA and [Tyr 0 ]NKA, in these micelles as discussed in an earlier section.…”
supporting
confidence: 95%
“…14 SP has a random structure in aqueous solutions, but exhibits a partial helical structure in the presence of phospholipid bilayers, 7,10 lipid micelles, 11,12 and sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) micelles. 12,13 NKA has been studied by nmr in water and in methanol, 15 in 28% trifluoroethanol (TFE)/water mixture, 16 and in 50 mM SDS micelles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conservation of these residues has led to the speculation that the Asn 23 -Phe 25 region of the NK-1R may play an important structural role in positioning or stabilizing the tertiary structure of the N terminus. Indeed, in the resulting model, these residues are at the point where the N terminus bends; the residues preceding Asn 23 are projecting over the seven-TM core, whereas the residues after Phe 25 18 ) would certainly play an important role in the proposed folding of the N terminus over the ligand in the central core of the seven transmembrane helices. The presence of the carbohydrate side chain residues does not appear to be necessary for ligand binding to the NK-1R as determined independently by photoaffinity labeling experiments (38) and receptor mutational analysis (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ligand⅐receptor complexes that best fulfilled the experimental restraints were utilized as starting structures for the following simulations. Based on numerous NMR studies of SP, an ␣-helix in the center of the sequence, from Gln 4 to Phe 8 , was assumed (25)(26)(27)(28)(29) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, shifts are seen in the pK,s of peptide titratable protons at SDS micelle surfaces (Fernandez & Fromherz, 1977;Woolley & Deber, 1987;O'Neil & Sykes, 1989;Beschiaschvili & Seelig, 1992). The pK, shifts are attributed to the reduced dielectric at the micelle-solution interface and the potential caused by the charged lipid head groups (Fernandez & Fromherz, 1977).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%