2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PeptX: Using Genetic Algorithms to optimize peptides for MHC binding

Abstract: BackgroundThe binding between the major histocompatibility complex and the presented peptide is an indispensable prerequisite for the adaptive immune response. There is a plethora of different in silico techniques for the prediction of the peptide binding affinity to major histocompatibility complexes. Most studies screen a set of peptides for promising candidates to predict possible T cell epitopes. In this study we ask the question vice versa: Which peptides do have highest binding affinities to a given majo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MHC-II binding predictions were made in November 2012 using the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) analysis tool "IEDB recommended" (www.iedb.org) (37,38). Query submission was automated using the framework provided by the PeptX project (39). Peptides with an IEDB percentile rank score of 5 or lower were used for further analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MHC-II binding predictions were made in November 2012 using the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) analysis tool "IEDB recommended" (www.iedb.org) (37,38). Query submission was automated using the framework provided by the PeptX project (39). Peptides with an IEDB percentile rank score of 5 or lower were used for further analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the sequence of the peptide can also be optimized in order to generate more high-affinity binders, as recently illustrated for MHC peptides. 30 Hence, it might be important to synchronize the selection procedures with the type of binding-specificity, that is degenerate vs. non-degenerate, that the retrieved clones are desired to display.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our evolutionary process differs from the standard genetic algorithm (GA) and evolutionary strategy (ES) onset [19] as well as from state of the art directed evolution of custom tailored characteristics [20], [21], [22] in several points. The work flow in the software is divided into two modules, one module is in charge of the general, ES-like cycle 2 and a second one for the internal, GA-like cycle 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%