2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in airborne particulate matter (PM2.0) emitted during floor waxing: A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou et al collected air samples in three rooms in a university building in North Carolina, United States in 2019 14 . This study aimed to assess occupational exposure from custodial activities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zhou et al collected air samples in three rooms in a university building in North Carolina, United States in 2019 14 . This study aimed to assess occupational exposure from custodial activities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The before and after samples were considered to reflect background PFAS levels in that building, and the samples during the waxing were considered to indicate the potential custodial occupational exposure to the waxer. Four of the ten PFAS estimated by Zhou et al were used in this analysis 14 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manufacturing, use, and disposal of products containing PFAS result in emission of these compounds to indoor and outdoor air. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Due to the lack of appropriate analytical techniques, these emissions are oen not directly measured, and instead are characterized by the downstream deposition of these compounds or their transformation products (which are oen still highly uorinated) to soil, water, dust, or ice. [13][14][15][16][17] When PFAS are directly measured in the gas or aerosol phase, they are measured in an offline mode, by either passive or active sampling onto media, followed by extraction and analysis via LC-MS or GC-MS. 4,[7][8][9][10][11][12] Offline measurements lack temporal resolution, and sample collection and preparation can introduce contamination and other biases or artefacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Due to the lack of appropriate analytical techniques, these emissions are oen not directly measured, and instead are characterized by the downstream deposition of these compounds or their transformation products (which are oen still highly uorinated) to soil, water, dust, or ice. [13][14][15][16][17] When PFAS are directly measured in the gas or aerosol phase, they are measured in an offline mode, by either passive or active sampling onto media, followed by extraction and analysis via LC-MS or GC-MS. 4,[7][8][9][10][11][12] Offline measurements lack temporal resolution, and sample collection and preparation can introduce contamination and other biases or artefacts. 18,19 Many PFAS are of atmospheric relevance, even though the few available gas and aerosol-phase measurement methods precludes a thorough understanding of PFAS in the atmosphere, especially for newer PFAS more recently brought into production that lead to new emerging contaminants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation