2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Per cell" normalization method for mRNA measurement by quantitative PCR and microarrays

Abstract: Background: Transcriptome data from quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) and DNA microarrays are typically obtained from a fixed amount of RNA collected per sample. Therefore, variations in tissue cellularity and RNA yield across samples in an experimental series compromise accurate determination of the absolute level of each mRNA species per cell in any sample. Since mRNAs are copied from genomic DNA, the simplest way to express mRNA level would be as copy number per template DNA, or more practically, as copy number per … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach minimizes the loss of signal intensity owing to biased purification procedures and allows for high through-put sample analysis using liquid handling robotics. Another advantage of this approach is that the lysates contain endogenous genomic DNA, which can be used to normalize the mRNA signals obtained in the RT-qPCR (15,16) without the need to analyse large panels of housekeeping genes (17). A potential disadvantage of this approach, on the other hand, is that most reagents used for preparing tissue lysates contain potent protein denaturants, high salt concentrations and chelating agents, which could inhibit or reduce the efficiency of the enzymatic reactions required for quantification (18).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach minimizes the loss of signal intensity owing to biased purification procedures and allows for high through-put sample analysis using liquid handling robotics. Another advantage of this approach is that the lysates contain endogenous genomic DNA, which can be used to normalize the mRNA signals obtained in the RT-qPCR (15,16) without the need to analyse large panels of housekeeping genes (17). A potential disadvantage of this approach, on the other hand, is that most reagents used for preparing tissue lysates contain potent protein denaturants, high salt concentrations and chelating agents, which could inhibit or reduce the efficiency of the enzymatic reactions required for quantification (18).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissues were homogenized with a motor-driven micropestle. DNA quantitation was performed using Quanti-it™ PicoGreen® dsDNA Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as previously described by Kanno et al (2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of different biochemical approaches have been utilized to quantify mRNA copy number on a per cell basis such as serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) (Velculescu et al ., 1999), quantitative PCR (qPCR) (Bengtsson et al ., 2008; Diercks et al ., 2009; Kanno et al ., 2006; Taniguchi et al ., 2009). Velculescu et al ., as early as 1999, published in Nature Genetics an analysis of the human transcriptome on a per cell basis using SAGE.…”
Section: Limitations Of Single-label Probes and Molecular Beaconsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely due to the fact that these cells are the major insulin producers in the pancreas and therefore large quantities are produced. In another study by Kanno et al ., they focused on normalization methods for “per cell” data from qPCR and DNA microarray studies (Kanno et al ., 2006). Data over a large number of genes were collected, over 14,000 genes in the mouse genome.…”
Section: Limitations Of Single-label Probes and Molecular Beaconsmentioning
confidence: 99%