2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Per-pixel land cover accuracy prediction: A random forest-based method with limited reference sample data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An RF classifier is generally composed of a large number of base weak classifiers, each of which is an independent individual classification and regression tree (CART). The RF-based model has been widely employed in RS communities and applied in various LULC classification tasks [22,[45][46][47]. To implement the RF, two fundamental parameters are needed in an RF: one is the number of trees (ntree) for constructing a whole forest, and the other is the number of picked features (mty) that are used for node splitting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An RF classifier is generally composed of a large number of base weak classifiers, each of which is an independent individual classification and regression tree (CART). The RF-based model has been widely employed in RS communities and applied in various LULC classification tasks [22,[45][46][47]. To implement the RF, two fundamental parameters are needed in an RF: one is the number of trees (ntree) for constructing a whole forest, and the other is the number of picked features (mty) that are used for node splitting.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Procedures for the classification of remote sensing images using shallow classifiers, such as RF and SVM include feature extraction and classification. Spatial, temporal, and spectral data of satellite images are transformed into the feature vectors in the feature extraction process, while these extracted features are classified into different land cover types in the classification stage [31], [32], [33]. It is worth highlighting that the manual feature engineering of the conventional classification methods (i.e., the selection of the most appropriate extracted features in the classification of satellite data) significantly affects the final classification results.…”
Section: A Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the maximum likelihood algorithm [19] is often unable to identify multi-dimensional remote sensing data correctly. For the classification of high-dimensional data, algorithms such as DT [29][30][31], RF [29,30,32], and SVM [33][34][35] performed better. Considering the success of these classification models for remote sensing image classification, deep learning approaches for remote sensing image classification have attracted great attention [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%