1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70777-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Per-rectal pulsed irrigation versus per-oral colonic lavage for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized, controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, poor compliance related to the salty taste, the smell from the sulfates, and the large volume of fluids required led to modifications of the PEG solutions and their dosing recommendations and reevaluations of other osmotic laxatives (e.g., sodium phosphate [NaP]). [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Chang et al 17 developed a method of pulsed rectal irrigation combined with magnesium citrate. These regimens and their use continue to evolve.…”
Section: Evolution Of Bowel Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, poor compliance related to the salty taste, the smell from the sulfates, and the large volume of fluids required led to modifications of the PEG solutions and their dosing recommendations and reevaluations of other osmotic laxatives (e.g., sodium phosphate [NaP]). [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Chang et al 17 developed a method of pulsed rectal irrigation combined with magnesium citrate. These regimens and their use continue to evolve.…”
Section: Evolution Of Bowel Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 However, while there was no significant difference between the two bowel cleansing approaches, patients who had the PIEE procedure reported more undesirable side effects, including those of GI bloating, distension, and discomfort, as well as producing an undesirable rise in the serum magnesium concentration due to pre-treatment with magnesium citrate. Since the PIEE procedure uses a small volume of water to stimulate peristaltic activity in the No significant difference were noted between groups for the number of polyps detected (F = 0.042, P = 0.859).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This was also evaluated in a gastrointestinal surgery setting, 11 and for bowel preparation. 12 It has also proven safe and eective for use in children. 13 This is the ®rst study evaluating a new, more portable and less expensive device using the pulsed irrigation evacuation principle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%