Perceived Barriers To Physical Activity In College Students

Piazza, Anna; Ode, Joshua J.; Lowry, John E.; Mudd, Lanay M.

doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000322858.43164.fa

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Somatic parameters were estimated with body height (BH) and body weight (BW). The level of physical fitness level we were evaluating with battery of 6 tests (19,20): Sit and reach (SR), standing broad jump (SBJ), overhead medicine ball (2 kg) throw (MT), shuttle run 10 x 5 m (10x5), sit -ups in 30 s (SU), endurance shuttle run (ENDUR).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Somatic Parameters and Physical Fitness Level Determination by Physical Activity Attitudes of Slovak University Students

SEDLACEK¹,

RUZBARSKY²,

ZVONAR³

et al. 2023

FIEP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Regular whole life recreational movement activity plays irreplaceable role for increasing individual health and prolonging active life. From the point of the view the childhood and adolescent age are the decisive periods for performing physical activities and its integration into life of each man. University students are specific and numerous social groups. Hey are in critical age from the point of performing recreational activities and thus their physical fitness level can often decrease. In this contribution authors deal with relationships of physical activity attitudes with somatic and physical fitness parameters of Slovak universities students.Material and methods: In this research are involved 606 students, 344 males and 262 females from two Bratislava Universities (8 faculties). Attitudes were estimated by Lickert scale in three components (cognitive, emotional and tendency to act), from somatic parameters were measured body height and body weight, physical fitness was evaluated with reduced Eurofit and former Czechoslovak battery tests: sit and reach, standing broad jump, medicine ball throw, shuttle run 10x5m, sit-ups and endurance shuttle run. We have available students from the Faculty of Physical Education and Sports (FSPORT) and from 8 different faculties (not physical education and sport study orientation). Differences and relationships were evaluated by t-test and correlative coefficients; we used •p<0.05, ••p<0.01 significance level. Results: We found that there are not great differences between somatic parameters FSPORT and others faculties, both male and female. In physical fitness factors reached clear majority FSPORT students. In attitudes reached significantly higher levels FSPORT students in all three components, mainly in component tendency to act. Gender differences in attitudes were not very different. Components of attitudes relate to physical fitness level mostly in groups of other faculties students, more often among females. Conclusions: We proved that lower like average values in component tendency to act in other faculties courses often lack of physical activity and it influences also lower level of physical fitness. We suppose that entrance in FSPORT studies also means that attitudes components must reach relatively higher levels.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%